Properties of the Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics Across Sex, Level of Familiarity, and Interpersonal Conflict. (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hopwood, Christopher J.; Harrison, Alana L.; Amole, Marlissa; Girard, Jeffrey M.; Wright, Aidan G. C.; Thomas, Katherine M.; Sadler, Pamela; Ansell, Emily B.; Chaplin, Tara M.; Morey, Leslie C.; Crowley, Michael J.; Emily Durbin, C.; Kashy, Deborah A.
• Is Part Of: Assessment. Volume 27:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 40
• Page End: 56
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: interpersonal circumplex -- sex -- gender -- familiarity -- conflict -- dynamics; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; Psychodiagnostics -- Periodicals; Personality tests -- Periodicals; 150.287
• DOI: 10.1177/1073191118798916
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1073-1911

Abstract

The Continuous Assessment of Interpersonal Dynamics (CAID) is a method in which trained observers continuously code the dominance and warmth of individuals who interact with one another in dyads. This method has significant promise for assessing dynamic interpersonal processes. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of individual sex, dyadic familiarity, and situational conflict on patterns of interpersonal warmth, dominance, and complementarity as assessed via CAID. We used six samples with 603 dyads, including two samples of unacquainted mixed-sex undergraduates interacting in a collaborative task, two samples of couples interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks, and two samples of mothers and children interacting in both collaborative and conflict tasks. Complementarity effects were robust across all samples, and individuals tended to be relatively warm and dominant. Results from multilevel models indicated that women were slightly warmer than men, whereas there were no sex differences in dominance. Unfamiliar dyads and dyads interacting in more collaborative tasks were relatively warmer, more submissive, and more complementary on warmth but less complementary on dominance. These findings speak to the utility of the CAID method for assessing interpersonal dynamics and provide norms for researchers who use the method for different types of samples and applications.