Satisficing in Mental Health Care Patients: The Effect of Cognitive Symptoms on Self-Report Data Quality. (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Conijn, Judith M.; van der Ark, L. Andries; Spinhoven, Philip
• Is Part Of: Assessment. Volume 27:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 178
• Page End: 193
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: careless responding -- cognitive psychopathology symptoms -- response inconsistency -- satisficing -- validity indices; Psychological tests -- Periodicals; Psychodiagnostics -- Periodicals; Personality tests -- Periodicals; 150.287
• DOI: 10.1177/1073191117714557
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1073-1911

Abstract

Respondents may use satisficing (i.e., nonoptimal) strategies when responding to self-report questionnaires. These satisficing strategies become more likely with decreasing motivation and/or cognitive ability (Krosnick, 1991). Considering that cognitive deficits are characteristic of depressive and anxiety disorders, depressed and anxious patients may be prone to satisficing. Using data from the Netherland's Study of Depression and Anxiety ( N = 2, 945), we studied the relationship between depression and anxiety, cognitive symptoms, and satisficing strategies on the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Results showed that respondents with either an anxiety disorder or a comorbid anxiety and depression disorder used satisficing strategies substantially more often than healthy respondents. Cognitive symptom severity partly mediated the effect of anxiety disorder and comorbid anxiety disorder on satisficing. The results suggest that depressed and anxious patients produce relatively low-quality self-report data—partly due to cognitive symptoms. Future research should investigate the degree of satisficing across different mental health care assessment contexts.