Telehealth Therapy Effects of Nurses and Mental Health Professionals From 2 Randomized Controlled Trials for Chronic Back Pain. Issue 4 (April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Telehealth Therapy Effects of Nurses and Mental Health Professionals From 2 Randomized Controlled Trials for Chronic Back Pain. Issue 4 (April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Telehealth Therapy Effects of Nurses and Mental Health Professionals From 2 Randomized Controlled Trials for Chronic Back Pain
- Authors:
- Gannon, Jamie
Atkinson, Joseph H.
Chircop-Rollick, Tatiana
D'Andrea, John
Garfin, Steven
Patel, Shetal
Penzien, Donald B.
Wallace, Mark
Weickgenant, Anne L.
Slater, Mark
Holloway, Rachael
Rutledge, Thomas - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To compare the efficacy of mental health professional versus primary care nurse-delivered telehealth cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and supportive care (SC) treatments for chronic low back pain, using data from 2 separate randomized controlled trials. Both trials were completed in the same hospital and used the same study design, research team, and outcome measures. Materials and Methods: Participants from Study 1 (Mental Health Professional Study) (N=66; 2007 to 2011) and Study 2 (Nursing Study) (N=61; 2012 to 2016) were patients with chronic low back pain (≥4/10 intensity) randomized to either an 8-week CBT or an SC telehealth condition matched for contact frequency, format, and time. Participants completed validated measures of improvement in back pain disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]), pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory 2 [BDI-2]), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS]), and overall improvement (Global Clinical Impressions [GCI]). Results: Intent-to-treat analyses at posttreatment showed that scores on the RMDQ (Cohen d =0.33 to 0.55), NRS ( d =0.45 to 0.90), PCS ( d =0.21 to 0.41), and GCI (18.5% to 39.1%) improved significantly in both studies and in both treatments from pretreatment to posttreatment. Changes in BDI scores were inconsistent ( d =−0.06 to 0.51). The analyses revealed no significant differences in treatment efficacy between theAbstract : Objective: To compare the efficacy of mental health professional versus primary care nurse-delivered telehealth cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and supportive care (SC) treatments for chronic low back pain, using data from 2 separate randomized controlled trials. Both trials were completed in the same hospital and used the same study design, research team, and outcome measures. Materials and Methods: Participants from Study 1 (Mental Health Professional Study) (N=66; 2007 to 2011) and Study 2 (Nursing Study) (N=61; 2012 to 2016) were patients with chronic low back pain (≥4/10 intensity) randomized to either an 8-week CBT or an SC telehealth condition matched for contact frequency, format, and time. Participants completed validated measures of improvement in back pain disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ]), pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory 2 [BDI-2]), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS]), and overall improvement (Global Clinical Impressions [GCI]). Results: Intent-to-treat analyses at posttreatment showed that scores on the RMDQ (Cohen d =0.33 to 0.55), NRS ( d =0.45 to 0.90), PCS ( d =0.21 to 0.41), and GCI (18.5% to 39.1%) improved significantly in both studies and in both treatments from pretreatment to posttreatment. Changes in BDI scores were inconsistent ( d =−0.06 to 0.51). The analyses revealed no significant differences in treatment efficacy between the trained nurse versus the mental health professionals on the RMDQ, NRS, PCS, or GCI measures ( P >0.20). Discussion: Results from these clinical trials suggest that the benefits of home-based, telehealth-delivered CBT and SC treatments for chronic back pain were comparable when delivered by a primary care nurse or mental health professional. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical journal of pain. Volume 35:Issue 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Clinical journal of pain
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Issue 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0035-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04
- Subjects:
- chronic back pain -- randomized controlled trial -- cognitive behavioral therapy
Pain -- Periodicals
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Analgesia -- Periodicals
616.047205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.8.1a/ovidweb.cgi?&S=KBIDFPKNAEDDLKHNNCOKIBOBIMNEAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.2.14.27%7c629%7c50 ↗
http://www.clinicalpain.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000678 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0749-8047
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.294200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11953.xml