Management of Lung Transplant Bronchial Stenosis With Mitomycin C. Issue 2 (April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davidson, Kevin R.; Elmasri, Mary; Wahidi, Momen M.; Shofer, Scott L.; Cheng, George Z.; Mahmood, Kamran
• Is Part Of: Journal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology. Volume 26:Issue 2(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-04
• Subjects: mitomycin -- lung transplant -- bronchial stenosis; Bronchoscopy -- Periodicals; Lungs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory Tract Diseases -- Periodicals; Lung Diseases -- surgery -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System -- Periodicals; Bronchi; Bronchoscopy; Lungs -- Diseases; Periodicals; 616.23
• DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000540
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1944-6586

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Bronchial stenosis is a significant source of morbidity among lung transplant recipients, with etiologies including infection and ischemia of the airways. Current management with balloon bronchoplasty and stents is imperfect and a subset of patients requires multiple procedures to maintain airway patency. Mitomycin C (MMC) has been utilized for its antifibrotic properties in nonmalignant tracheobronchial stenosis but its application is not well studied in post–lung transplant stenosis. We performed this study to assess if MMC application decreases the need for repeated balloon bronchoplasty in lung transplant–related airway stenosis. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all lung transplant recipients who developed airway stenosis and who were treated with MMC over 4 years. MMC was injected submucosally into the stenotic airway. We compared the rate of bronchoscopic dilation at intervals of 3 and 6 months before and after MMC therapy. Results: Eleven lung transplant recipients, with airway stenosis were included in our study, who required recurrent balloon dilation, despite airway stents in place in 73% of these patients. At 3 months after MMC treatment the median number of dilations decreased from 3 to 1 ( P =0.023), and at 6 months from 3 to 2 dilations ( P =0.004). There was a trend toward improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity, although it was not statistically significant. No adverse events related to MMC therapy was observed Conclusion: Application of MMC is safe and is associated with a reduction in frequency of bronchoscopic balloon dilation in patients with post–lung transplant airway stenosis.