Application of a Prognostic Stratification System for High-risk Prostate Cancer to Patients Treated With Radiotherapy: Implications for Treatment Optimization. (April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Application of a Prognostic Stratification System for High-risk Prostate Cancer to Patients Treated With Radiotherapy: Implications for Treatment Optimization. (April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Application of a Prognostic Stratification System for High-risk Prostate Cancer to Patients Treated With Radiotherapy
- Authors:
- Foster, Benjamin
Jackson, William
Foster, Corey
Dess, Robert
Abu-Isa, Eyad
McLaughlin, Patrick William
Merrick, Gregory
Hearn, Jason
Spratt, Daniel
Liauw, Stanley
Hamstra, Daniel - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: We applied an established prognostic model to high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) and evaluated the influence of clinical and treatment variables on treatment outcomes. Methods: In total, 1075 HRPC patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 1995 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Median follow-up was 62.3 months. Patients received either dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (n=628, EBRT) or combined-modality radiotherapy (n=447, pelvic RT and low-dose rate brachytherapy boost, CMRT). 82.9% received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). A prognostic model stratified patients into predefined groups (good, intermediate, and poor). Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regressions assessed biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM). C-indices analyzed predictive value. Results: The model was prognostic; C-indices for BF, DM, PCSM and OM were: 0.62, 0.64, 0.61, and 0.57. On multivariate analysis, CMRT and longer ADT (≥24 mo) were associated with improved BF, DM, and PCSM. Gleason score (GS) 9-10 was the strongest predictor of PCSM. C-indices for BF, DM, PCSM, and OM using a 4-compartment model incorporating GS 9-10 were: 0.62, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.56. In poor-prognosis patients (GS 8-10+additional risk factors), CMRT+LTADT (>12 mo) had 10-year PCSM (3.7%±3.6%), comparing favorably to 25.8%±9.2% with EBRT+LTADT.Abstract : Objectives: We applied an established prognostic model to high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) and evaluated the influence of clinical and treatment variables on treatment outcomes. Methods: In total, 1075 HRPC patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy (RT) between 1995 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Median follow-up was 62.3 months. Patients received either dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (n=628, EBRT) or combined-modality radiotherapy (n=447, pelvic RT and low-dose rate brachytherapy boost, CMRT). 82.9% received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). A prognostic model stratified patients into predefined groups (good, intermediate, and poor). Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regressions assessed biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM). C-indices analyzed predictive value. Results: The model was prognostic; C-indices for BF, DM, PCSM and OM were: 0.62, 0.64, 0.61, and 0.57. On multivariate analysis, CMRT and longer ADT (≥24 mo) were associated with improved BF, DM, and PCSM. Gleason score (GS) 9-10 was the strongest predictor of PCSM. C-indices for BF, DM, PCSM, and OM using a 4-compartment model incorporating GS 9-10 were: 0.62, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.56. In poor-prognosis patients (GS 8-10+additional risk factors), CMRT+LTADT (>12 mo) had 10-year PCSM (3.7%±3.6%), comparing favorably to 25.8%±9.2% with EBRT+LTADT. Conclusions: The model applies to high-risk RT patients; GS 9-10 remains a powerful predictor of PCSM. Comparing similar prognosis patients, CMRT is associated with improved disease-specific outcomes relative to EBRT. In poor-prognosis patients, CMRT+LTADT yields superior 10-year PCSM, potentially improving RT treatment personalization for those with HRPC. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of clinical oncology. Volume 42:Number 4(2019)
- Journal:
- American journal of clinical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Number 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0042-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04
- Subjects:
- high-risk prostate cancer -- brachytherapy -- androgen deprivation -- Gleason score
Cancer -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Oncology -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00000421-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.amjclinicaloncology.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/COC.0000000000000521 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0277-3732
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0823.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11948.xml