The Problematic Nature of Fibromyalgia Diagnosis in the Community. Issue 1 (15th March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Problematic Nature of Fibromyalgia Diagnosis in the Community. Issue 1 (15th March 2019)
- Main Title:
- The Problematic Nature of Fibromyalgia Diagnosis in the Community
- Authors:
- Srinivasan, Sachin
Maloney, Eamon
Wright, Brynn
Kennedy, Michael
Kallail, K. James
Rasker, Johannes J.
Häuser, Winfried
Wolfe, Frederick - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Recently, some studies suggested that clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia is inaccurate and does not reflect current definitions. However, this hypothesis has not been tested. We examined whether fibromyalgia was accurately diagnosed in the community. Methods: We surveyed 3276 primary care patients to determine current fibromyalgia status by criteria (CritFM). We also determined whether the patients had a physician's diagnosis of fibromyalgia (MDFM) and the level of symptom severity as measured by the polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD). Results: The prevalence of MDFM and CritFM was 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3%, 6.9%) and 5.5% (95% CI 4.8%, 6.3%), respectively. However, only 32.2% with MDFM met 2016 criteria (CritFM), and only 35.4% with CritFM also had MDFM. The kappa statistic for diagnostic agreement was 0.296 (minimal agreement). The mean PSD score was 12.4 and 18.4 in MDFM and CritFM, respectively. The odds ratio for being a woman compared with being a man was 3.2 for MDFM versus 1.9 for CritFM, P = 0.023. Of the patients with MDFM, 68.3% received specific fibromyalgia pharmacotherapy. Conclusions: There is little agreement between MDFM and CritFM. Only one‐third of MDFM satisfy fibromyalgia criteria, and only one‐third of patients who meet the criteria have a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Physician diagnosis is biased and more likely in women. Fibromyalgia treatment is common in MDFM (70.7%). Overall, MDFM appears subjective andAbstract : Background: Recently, some studies suggested that clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia is inaccurate and does not reflect current definitions. However, this hypothesis has not been tested. We examined whether fibromyalgia was accurately diagnosed in the community. Methods: We surveyed 3276 primary care patients to determine current fibromyalgia status by criteria (CritFM). We also determined whether the patients had a physician's diagnosis of fibromyalgia (MDFM) and the level of symptom severity as measured by the polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD). Results: The prevalence of MDFM and CritFM was 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3%, 6.9%) and 5.5% (95% CI 4.8%, 6.3%), respectively. However, only 32.2% with MDFM met 2016 criteria (CritFM), and only 35.4% with CritFM also had MDFM. The kappa statistic for diagnostic agreement was 0.296 (minimal agreement). The mean PSD score was 12.4 and 18.4 in MDFM and CritFM, respectively. The odds ratio for being a woman compared with being a man was 3.2 for MDFM versus 1.9 for CritFM, P = 0.023. Of the patients with MDFM, 68.3% received specific fibromyalgia pharmacotherapy. Conclusions: There is little agreement between MDFM and CritFM. Only one‐third of MDFM satisfy fibromyalgia criteria, and only one‐third of patients who meet the criteria have a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Physician diagnosis is biased and more likely in women. Fibromyalgia treatment is common in MDFM (70.7%). Overall, MDFM appears subjective and unrelated to fibromyalgia criteria. There appears to be no common definition of fibromyalgia in the community. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- ACR open rheumatology. Volume 1:Issue 1(2019)
- Journal:
- ACR open rheumatology
- Issue:
- Volume 1:Issue 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 1, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 1
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0001-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 43
- Page End:
- 51
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03-15
- Subjects:
- Rheumatology -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/loi/25785745 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/acr2.1006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2578-5745
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11942.xml