The Impact of Moderate Priors For Bayesian Estimation and Testing of Item Factor Analysis Models When Maximum Likelihood is Unsuitable. Issue 1 (2nd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bainter, Sierra A.; Forster, Daniel E.
• Is Part Of: Structural equation modeling. Volume 26:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 80
• Page End: 93
• Publication Date: 2019-01-02
• Subjects: Bayesian estimation -- Item factor analysis -- small sample -- model fit; Multivariate analysis -- Periodicals; Social sciences -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; 519.535
• DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1505521
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1070-5511

Abstract

Abstract : In psychological research, available data are often insufficient to estimate item factor analysis (IFA) models using traditional estimation methods, such as maximum likelihood (ML) or limited information estimators. Bayesian estimation with common-sense, moderately informative priors can greatly improve efficiency of parameter estimates and stabilize estimation. There are a variety of methods available to evaluate model fit in a Bayesian framework; however, past work investigating Bayesian model fit assessment for IFA models has assumed flat priors, which have no advantage over ML in limited data settings. In this paper, we evaluated the impact of moderately informative priors on ability to detect model misfit for several candidate indices: posterior predictive checks based on the observed score distribution, leave-one-out cross-validation, and widely available information criterion (WAIC). We found that although Bayesian estimation with moderately informative priors is an excellent aid for estimating challenging IFA models, methods for testing model fit in these circumstances are inadequate.