Biomechanical evaluation of a transcondylar screw from the dorsolateral plate support on the stabilization of orthogonal plate configuration in distal humeral fracture. Issue 2 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hara, Akira; Kudo, Toshiya; Ichihara, Satoshi; Iwase, Hideaki; Nagao, Masashi; Maruyama, Yuichiro; Kaneko, Kazuo
• Is Part Of: Injury. Volume 50:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 256
• Page End: 262
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fracture -- Radial column -- Ulnar column -- Distal humeral plate -- Artificial bone -- Dorsolateral plate; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Accidents -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- surgery -- Periodicals; Lésions et blessures -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-1383

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Intra-articular distal humeral fractures involving both columns require double-plate fixation. In orthogonal plate fixation, screws from the medial plate reach the radial column, while screws from the dorsolateral plate run posterior–anterior, not creating interdigitation. The Synthes LCP-DHP system has an orthogonal plate configuration that enables dorsolateral plating with support, as the radial and ulnar columns are linked via interdigitation of the distal screws. We hypothesized that the transcondylar screw from the posterolateral plate, which interdigitates with screws from the medial plate, enables more rigid stabilization of orthogonal plating in distal humeral AO type C fractures. Methods: A previous study reported the biomechanical properties of orthogonal plate fixation using an AO type 13-C2.3 intra-articular fracture model with a 1-cm supracondylar gap using artificial bones (Kudo et al., Injury, 2016). We performed a biomechanical study of the dorsolateral plate with support, and inserted one 2.7-mm locking screw through the support in the lateral-to-medial direction, creating interdigitation of the distal screws. A 0–200 N axial load was applied separately to the radial and ulnar columns. We calculated the stiffness of both columns, and the anterior displacement of the condylar fragment. We compared the biomechanical properties of orthogonal plating with versus without interdigitation. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in radial or ulnar axial compression. The ulnar column was stiffer than the radial column in both groups. There were no significant differences between groups in the angular displacements of the capitellum or trochlea. The capitellum moved more anteriorly than the trochlea during axial compression in both groups. Discussion: The radial and ulnar columns were linked via interdigitation of the distal screws by adding one transcondylar screw from the dorsolateral plate, which did not affect radial column stiffness or capitellar anterior movement under axial compression. In the orthogonal configuration, axial compression induced more anterior displacement of the capitellum than the trochlea, which may induce secondary fragment or screw dislocation on the dorsolateral plate or nonunion at the supracondylar level. Conclusions: The transcondylar screw from the dorsolateral plate did not affect axial compression of the radial column or capitellar anterior displacement.