Proteomics of acquired pellicle in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with or without erosive tooth wear. (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martini, Tatiana; Rios, Daniela; Cassiano, Luiza Paula Silva; Silva, Cíntia Maria de Souza; Taira, Even Akemi; Ventura, Talita Mendes Silva; Pereira, Heloísa Aparecida Barbosa Silva; Magalhães, Ana Carolina; Carvalho, Thiago Saads; Baumann, Tommy; Lussi, Adrian; Oliveira, Ricardo Brandt; Palma-Dibb, Regina Guenka; Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo
• Is Part Of: Journal of dentistry. Volume 81(2019:Feb.)
• Page Start: 64
• Page End: 69
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Acquired enamel pellicle -- Erosive tooth wear -- Gastroesophageal reflux -- Proteomics; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentisterie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 617.6005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-5712

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: This in vivo study compared the protein profile of the acquired enamel pellicle (AEP) in volunteers 1) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive tooth wear (ETW) (BEWE ≥ 9; GE group); 2) with GERD without ETW (BEWE = 0; GNE group) and 3) control (without GERD and BEWE = 0; C group). Materials and methods: Twenty-four subjects (8/group) participated. AEP was formed during 120 min and collected. After protein extraction, the samples were submitted to reverse phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Label-free proteomic quantification was performed using Protein Lynx Global Service software. Results: In total, 458 proteins were identified. Seventy-six proteins were common to all the groups. The proteomic profile of the AEP was quite different among the distinct groups. The numbers of proteins exclusively found in the C, GE and GNE groups were 113, 110 and 81, respectively. Most of the proteins exclusively identified in the C and GNE groups bind metals, while those in the GE group are mainly membrane proteins. Many proteins were found exclusively in the reflux groups. In the quantitative analyses, when the GNE group was compared with the GE group, the proteins with the highest decreases were Lysozyme C, Antileukoproteinase, Cathepsin G, Neutrophil defensins and Basic salivary proline-rich proteins, while those with the highest increases were subunits of Hemoglobin, Albumin and isoforms of Cystatin. Conclusion: Profound alterations in the proteomic profile of the AEP were seen in GNE compared with GE volunteers, which might play a role in the resistance to ETW seen in the first. Clinical significance: This pioneer study compared the proteomic profile of the AEP of patients with GERD with or without ETW. Increased proteins in those without ETW might be protective and are good candidates to be added to dental products to protect against erosion caused by intrinsic acids.