Competition among functional groups increases asynchrony of their temporal fluctuations in a temperate grassland. (14th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lepš, Jan; Šmilauerová, Marie; Šmilauer, Petr
• Editors: Scheiner, Sam
• Is Part Of: Journal of vegetation science. Volume 30:Number 6(2019:Nov.)
• Page Start: 1068
• Page End: 1077
• Publication Date: 2019-09-14
• Subjects: asynchrony -- biomass fluctuation -- compensatory dynamics -- competition -- functional groups -- removal experiment -- stability; Plant ecology -- Periodicals; Plant communities -- Periodicals; Plant populations -- Periodicals; 581.7
• DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12803
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1100-9233

Abstract

Abstract: Questions: We asked whether the competition among community components (a) destabilizes individual components; (b) increases the asynchrony of their fluctuations; and (c) stabilizes the total community biomass. Location: Seminatural meadow in South Bohemia, Czech Republic. Methods: We used biomass fluctuation data from a 13‐year removal experiment. The plots used for this study contained, following experimental removal of other species, either mycorrhizal grasses only, mycorrhizal forbs only, or their mixture (grass "monocultures", forb "monocultures", and mixtures, respectively). Yearly peak aboveground biomass was available from ten blocks; biomass of the mixture plots was sorted into forbs and grasses. Temporal variability was characterized by coefficient of variation (CV) and synchrony by correlation coefficient, both calculated from the time series data. Results: The variability of grass monocultures was higher than the variability of forb monocultures, which was slightly lower than the variability of mixtures. The variability of both grasses and forbs was higher in the mixture, where they are in competition with the other group, than in each of their respective monocultures. The correlation coefficients between the biomass of grass and forb monocultures within blocks were mostly positive, indicating that both groups tend to have similar physiological responses to weather fluctuations. The average correlation coefficient between the forbs and grasses in the mixture plots was significantly negative, thus reflecting the effect of competition between these two community components. The CV of the sum of forb and grass monocultures was similar to the CV of mixture plots. Conclusions: Only competition between grasses and forbs leads to their negative mutual correlation, i.e., to compensatory dynamics. Our results support the hypothesis that competition has a destabilizing effect on individual community components (functional groups in our case) and increases asynchrony of their fluctuations. We have not found its stabilizing effect on the total biomass. Abstract : In a long‐term removal experiment, two functional groups (grasses and forbs) grew either separately (in "monocultures") or together in a mixture. The temporal fluctuation of biomass was lowest in the monoculture of forbs and highest in the monoculture of grasses. When grown in mixture (i.e., in competition) the temporal fluctuation of components increased and they were negatively correlated.