Kinematic Visual Biofeedback Improves Accuracy of Swallowing Maneuver Training and Accuracy of Clinician Cues During Training in Stroke Patients with Dysphagia. Issue 11 (22nd April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vose, Alicia K.; Marcus, Arielle; Humbert, Ianessa
• Is Part Of: PM&R. Volume 11:Issue 11(2019)
• Page Start: 1159
• Page End: 1169
• Publication Date: 2019-04-22
• Subjects: Medical rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Physical therapy -- Periodicals; Physical Therapy Modalities -- Periodicals; 615.5
• DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12093
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1934-1482

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is a common and often life‐threatening problem after stroke. Submental surface electromyography (ssEMG) visual biofeedback is a commonly used clinical tool to train novel swallowing maneuvers, even though its effectiveness has been questioned. Objective: To compare the effect of ssEMG and videofluoroscopy (VF) visual biofeedback on swallowing airway protection accuracy when training the volitional laryngeal closure swallowing maneuver (vLVC) in poststroke patients with dysphagia. Researchers also examined whether clinicians accurately judged vLVC performance. The hypothesis was that patient vLVC accuracy and clinician verbal cue accuracy will be greatest with VF (kinematic) visual biofeedback. Patients: Nineteen patients with dysphagia post stroke. Setting: Outpatient swallowing research laboratory. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Methods: Patients underwent 2 study phases. Phase 1: first demonstrated ability to perform the vLVC accurately. Phase 2: vLVC training. Participants were randomized into three biofeedback groups including the ssEMG group (ssEMG biofeedback in both phases), the VF group (VF biofeedback in both phases), and the mixed group (VF phase 1, ssEMG phase 2). To promote the best vLVC performance, a clinician provided real‐time, verbal cueing using only the visual biofeedback type also seen by the patient, although both VF and ssEMG were recorded for all participants. Main Outcome Measure: Patient performance accuracy and clinician feedback accuracy for performing the vLVC maneuver. Results: Both accuracy of vLVC training performance and clinician feedback accuracy were worse in the ssEMG group compared with the VF and mixed groups ( P < .001). Conclusions: Swallowing airway protection requires precisely timed movements of small, hidden laryngeal and pharyngeal structures. Kinematic biofeedback (VF) may be required, at some point, to ensure that target swallowing movements are being trained during rehabilitation, rather than maladaptive movements. Level of Evidence: I.