Geographic and taxonomic patterns of extinction risk in Australian squamates. (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Geographic and taxonomic patterns of extinction risk in Australian squamates. (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Geographic and taxonomic patterns of extinction risk in Australian squamates
- Authors:
- Tingley, Reid
Macdonald, Stewart L.
Mitchell, Nicola J.
Woinarski, John C.Z.
Meiri, Shai
Bowles, Phil
Cox, Neil A.
Shea, Glenn M.
Böhm, Monika
Chanson, Janice
Tognelli, Marcelo F.
Harris, Jaclyn
Walke, Claire
Harrison, Natasha
Victor, Savannah
Woods, Calum
Amey, Andrew P.
Bamford, Mike
Catt, Gareth
Clemann, Nick
Couper, Patrick J.
Cogger, Hal
Cowan, Mark
Craig, Michael D.
Dickman, Chris R.
Doughty, Paul
Ellis, Ryan
Fenner, Aaron
Ford, Stewart
Gaikhorst, Glen
Gillespie, Graeme R.
Greenlees, Matthew J.
Hobson, Rod
Hoskin, Conrad J.
How, Ric
Hutchinson, Mark N.
Lloyd, Ray
McDonald, Peter
Melville, Jane
Michael, Damian R.
Moritz, Craig
Oliver, Paul M.
Peterson, Garry
Robertson, Peter
Sanderson, Chris
Somaweera, Ruchira
Teale, Roy
Valentine, Leonie
Vanderduys, Eric
Venz, Melanie
Wapstra, Erik
Wilson, Steve
Chapple, David G.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Australia is a global hotspot of reptile diversity, hosting ~10% of the world's squamate (snake and lizard) species. Yet the conservation status of the Australian squamate fauna has not been assessed for >25 years; a period during which the described fauna has risen by ~40%. Here we provide the first comprehensive conservation assessment of Australian terrestrial squamates using IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Most (86.4%; n = 819/948) Australian squamates were categorised as Least Concern, 4.5% were Data Deficient, and 7.1% (range 6.8%–11.3%, depending on the treatment of Data Deficient species) were threatened (3.0% Vulnerable, 2.7% Endangered, 1.1% Critically Endangered). This level of threat is low relative to the global average (~18%). One species ( Emoia nativitatis ) was assessed as Extinct, and two species ( Lepidodactylus listeri and Cryptoblepharus egeriae ) are considered Extinct in the Wild: all three were endemic to Christmas Island. Most (75.1%) threat assessments were based on geographic range attributes, due to limited data on population trends or relevant proxies. Agriculture, fire, and invasive species were the threats that affected the most species, and there was substantial geographic variation in the number of species affected by each threat. Threatened species richness peaked on islands, in the Southern Alps, and across northern Australia. Data deficiency was greatest in northern Australia and in coastal Queensland. ApproximatelyAbstract: Australia is a global hotspot of reptile diversity, hosting ~10% of the world's squamate (snake and lizard) species. Yet the conservation status of the Australian squamate fauna has not been assessed for >25 years; a period during which the described fauna has risen by ~40%. Here we provide the first comprehensive conservation assessment of Australian terrestrial squamates using IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Most (86.4%; n = 819/948) Australian squamates were categorised as Least Concern, 4.5% were Data Deficient, and 7.1% (range 6.8%–11.3%, depending on the treatment of Data Deficient species) were threatened (3.0% Vulnerable, 2.7% Endangered, 1.1% Critically Endangered). This level of threat is low relative to the global average (~18%). One species ( Emoia nativitatis ) was assessed as Extinct, and two species ( Lepidodactylus listeri and Cryptoblepharus egeriae ) are considered Extinct in the Wild: all three were endemic to Christmas Island. Most (75.1%) threat assessments were based on geographic range attributes, due to limited data on population trends or relevant proxies. Agriculture, fire, and invasive species were the threats that affected the most species, and there was substantial geographic variation in the number of species affected by each threat. Threatened species richness peaked on islands, in the Southern Alps, and across northern Australia. Data deficiency was greatest in northern Australia and in coastal Queensland. Approximately one-in-five threatened species were not represented in a single protected area. Our analyses shed light on the species, regions, and threats in most urgent need of conservation intervention. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biological conservation. Volume 238(2019)
- Journal:
- Biological conservation
- Issue:
- Volume 238(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 238, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 238
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0238-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- Assessment -- Conservation status -- Extinction risk -- IUCN -- Reptiles -- Threat status
Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals
Nature conservation -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Environment -- Periodicals
Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
333.9516 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00063207 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108203 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0006-3207
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2075.100000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11920.xml