A comparison of snowmelt‐derived streamflow from temperature‐index and modified‐temperature‐index snow models. Issue 23 (14th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Follum, Michael L.; Niemann, Jeffrey D.; Fassnacht, Steven R.
• Is Part Of: Hydrological processes. Volume 33:Issue 23(2019)
• Page Start: 3030
• Page End: 3045
• Publication Date: 2019-08-14
• Subjects: radiation‐derived temperature‐index -- Senator Beck Basin -- snowmelt -- snow‐covered area -- streamflow simulation -- temperature‐index; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Research -- Periodicals; Hydrologic models -- Periodicals; Hydrological forecasting -- Periodicals; 631.432
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13545
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6087

Abstract

Abstract: Reliable estimation of the volume and timing of snowmelt runoff is vital for water supply and flood forecasting in snow‐dominated regions. Snowmelt is often simulated using temperature‐index (TI) models due to their applicability in data‐sparse environments. Previous research has shown that a modified‐TI model, which uses a radiation‐derived proxy temperature instead of air temperature as its surrogate for available energy, can produce more accurate snow‐covered area (SCA) maps than a traditional TI model. However, it is unclear whether the improved SCA maps are associated with improved snow water equivalent (SWE) estimation across the watershed or improved snowmelt‐derived streamflow simulation. This paper evaluates whether a modified‐TI model produces better streamflow estimates than a TI model when they are used within a fully distributed hydrologic model. It further evaluates the performance of the two models when they are calibrated using either point SWE measurements or SCA maps. The Senator Beck Basin in Colorado is used as the study site because its surface is largely bedrock, which reduces the role of infiltration and emphasizes the role of the SWE pattern on streamflow generation. Streamflow is simulated using both models for 6 years. The modified‐TI model produces more accurate streamflow estimates (including flow volume and peak flow rate) than the TI model, likely because the modified‐TI model better reproduces the SWE pattern across the watershed. Both models also produce better performance when calibrated with SCA maps instead of point SWE data, likely because the SCA maps better constrain the space‐time pattern of SWE.