A small number of residual teeth after the mandibular resection of oral cancer is associated with titanium reconstruction plate exposure. Issue 5 (7th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hirohata, Hiromi; Yanagawa, Toru; Takaoka, Shohei; Yamagata, Kenji; Sasaki, Kaoru; Shibuya, Yoichiro; Uchida, Fumihiko; Fukuzawa, Satoshi; Tabuchi, Katsuhiko; Hasegawa, Shogo; Ishibashi‐Kanno, Naomi; Sekido, Mitsuru; Bukawa, Hiroki
• Is Part Of: Clinical and experimental dental research. Volume 5:Issue 5(2019)
• Page Start: 469
• Page End: 475
• Publication Date: 2019-06-07
• Subjects: mandibular reconstruction -- neoplasm -- reconstruction plate; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentistry; Oral Medicine; Mouth Diseases; Dentistry; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 617.6
• DOI: 10.1002/cre2.208
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2057-4347

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Reconstruction plates are used to treat patients with a segmental mandibular defect after oral cancer surgery. Reconstruction plate failure analysis has rarely focused on occlusion, which conducts a mechanical force to the mandible and the plate. To determine the prognostic factors, we retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent reconstruction of a mandibular segmental defect with a reconstruction plate and assessed the number of residual paired teeth. Material and Methods: From among 390 patients with oral cancer who visited University of Tsukuba Hospital (Tsukuba, Japan) between 2007 and 2017, we selected and analyzed the data of 37 patients who underwent segmental resection of the mandible and reconstruction with reconstruction plates. Prognostic factors evaluated were patient age, sex, TNM classification, plate manufacturer, treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, whether the patient had diabetes or smoked, and whether the patient had a small number of residual paired teeth, plate length, and use of a fibular‐free flap. Among these 37 patients, eight reconstruction plates had intraoral or extraoral exposure and were removed in 5 years. Results: Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank analyses revealed that the prognosis for the 5‐year plate exposure‐free rate was significantly poorer for patients with a small number of residual teeth than for patients with no teeth or those with a large number of residual teeth (.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a small number of residual teeth was a significant prognostic factor in the loss of a reconstruction plate (hazard ratio: 5.63; 95% confidence interval [1.10, 25.85]; .04). Conclusions: A small number of residual teeth after the segmental resection of oral cancer is significantly involved in reconstruction plate survival and may be important in predicting reconstruction plate prognosis.