Conditional citizens and hostile environments: Polish migrants in pre-Brexit Britain. Issue 106 (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burrell, Kathy; Schweyher, Mateus
• Is Part Of: Geoforum. Issue 106(2019)
• Page Start: 193
• Page End: 201
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: Hostile environment -- Everyday bordering -- Conditionality -- Freedom of movement -- Brexit -- Polish migrants -- Whiteness; Geography -- Periodicals; Human geography -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Sciences de la terre -- Périodiques; Géographie -- Périodiques; Géographie humaine -- Périodiques; Aménagement du territoire -- Périodiques; Earth sciences; Geography; Human geography; Regional planning; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 304.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-7185

Abstract

Highlights: Welfare bordering and hostile environment policies have affected Polish migrants, pre-Brexit. The impacts of these are highly variable, depending on social and economic situations. Some of the protections offered by whiteness are often negated in everyday border encounters. State and border encounters were understood and contextualised in different ways by participants. Other aspects of life, like work, were more important for our participants than the everyday border. Abstract: This article explores recent shifts in the governance of British migration and welfare regimes, considering how far a so called 'authoritarian turn' (Tyler, 2018) in immigration policy has reached into the everyday lives of Polish migrants – a population nominally protected by mobile EU citizenship status in the UK. Theoretically framed by debates about racialised governmentality, everyday bordering and conditionality, the discussion draws on a series of in-depth interviews undertaken with Poles in late 2017 into early 2018. Firstly, the article makes important contributions to understanding how broader hostile environment and welfare bordering policies are affecting people who hold more secure migration statuses – not only those deemed 'illegal' – and how this is in turn shaped both by whiteness and by socio-economic position. It also documents the relevance Brexit has to these developments and the future security of EU citizens. But it also underlines how the protections that freedom of movement extend are currently still significant, despite efforts to erode them. Hostile environment, welfare reforms, even Brexit – these were all present in our respondents' narratives, but not dominant. The discussions analysed here then bring a more nuanced appreciation of how different people come up against the state and the everyday border, as well as how these encounters are made sense of in an interview setting. They highlight the importance of acknowledging a wider range of the sources of power which shape everyday lives, from relationships to experiences in the workplace, in which hostile environment encounters and Brexit anxieties are contextualised.