Comparison of trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for acetabular shell fixation in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for acetabular shell fixation in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric study. (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for acetabular shell fixation in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaveric study
- Authors:
- Burkhart, Timothy A.
Khadem, Mehrdad
Wood, Thomas J.
Dunning, Cynthia E.
Degen, Ryan
Lanting, Brent A. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Total hip arthroplasty complications are associated with mechanical loosening of the acetabular component, which may be attributed to the type of fixation used (press fit, trans-cortical screws, cancellous screws). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for fixation of the acetabular shell. Methods: Five cadaveric pelvis specimens were hemisected (N = 10) at the sacroiliac joint. Each hemi-pelvis was initially tested with a press fit cup followed by the left and right pairs being randomized to either a cancellous or trans-cortical screw condition. Each fixation was tested by applying a load to a rod inserted into the centre of the acetabular cup at 0.5 mm/s, until failure occurred. The failure force, failure moment, and the rotation angle of the cup at failure were calculated. Findings: The cups fixated with a trans-cortical screw failed at a significantly greater mean [SD] force (1046.20 [386.52] N). The trans-cortical screws also significantly increased the angle of failure 46.29 (16.90) ° compared to the press-fit cups (6.73 [4.59] °). Finally, there was a significant increase in the failure moment, such that, the trans-cortical condition failed at a mean (SD) moment of 53.75 (16.24) Nm compared to 9.59 (1.85) Nm and 32.15 (18.16) Nm for the press fit and cancellous ( p = 0.044) conditions, respectively. Interpretation: The acetabular shells that were fixated with trans-cortical screwsAbstract: Background: Total hip arthroplasty complications are associated with mechanical loosening of the acetabular component, which may be attributed to the type of fixation used (press fit, trans-cortical screws, cancellous screws). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare trans-cortical and cancellous screws to press fit for fixation of the acetabular shell. Methods: Five cadaveric pelvis specimens were hemisected (N = 10) at the sacroiliac joint. Each hemi-pelvis was initially tested with a press fit cup followed by the left and right pairs being randomized to either a cancellous or trans-cortical screw condition. Each fixation was tested by applying a load to a rod inserted into the centre of the acetabular cup at 0.5 mm/s, until failure occurred. The failure force, failure moment, and the rotation angle of the cup at failure were calculated. Findings: The cups fixated with a trans-cortical screw failed at a significantly greater mean [SD] force (1046.20 [386.52] N). The trans-cortical screws also significantly increased the angle of failure 46.29 (16.90) ° compared to the press-fit cups (6.73 [4.59] °). Finally, there was a significant increase in the failure moment, such that, the trans-cortical condition failed at a mean (SD) moment of 53.75 (16.24) Nm compared to 9.59 (1.85) Nm and 32.15 (18.16) Nm for the press fit and cancellous ( p = 0.044) conditions, respectively. Interpretation: The acetabular shells that were fixated with trans-cortical screws provide greater stability compared to the press-fit cups or cancellous screws. Highlights: The type of screw fixation may contribute to hip arthroplasty complications. Trans-cortical screws, cancellous screws, and pres-fit are all viable options. Trans-cortical screws resulted in greater failure force and failure rotation. Trans-cortical-screws resulted in greater failure moment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical biomechanics. Volume 69(2019)
- Journal:
- Clinical biomechanics
- Issue:
- Volume 69(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0069-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 34
- Page End:
- 38
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Osteopathic medicine -- Periodicals
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Osteopathic Medicine -- Periodicals
612.76 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02680033 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.017 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0268-0033
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.262800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11910.xml