The discrepancy between the uroflowmetry parameters, curve patterns, and lower urinary tract symptoms of children with nocturnal enuresis according to the presence or absence of daytime urinary incontinence. Issue 8 (20th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hyuga, Taiju; Nakamura, Shigeru; Kawai, Shina; Tanabe, Kazuya; Nakai, Hideo
• Is Part Of: Neurourology and urodynamics. Volume 38:Issue 8(2019:Nov.)
• Page Start: 2318
• Page End: 2323
• Publication Date: 2019-08-20
• Subjects: lower urinary tract symptoms -- nocturnal enuresis -- urge -- urodynamics; Urinary organs -- Periodicals; Urodynamics -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6
• DOI: 10.1002/nau.24146
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0733-2467

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To evaluate the uroflowmetry (UFM), which reflects the urinary symptoms of children with nocturnal enuresis (NE). Methods: This study retrospectively investigated 93 children who underwent UFM three times on the same day (≥8 years old; mean age: 9 years and 10 months; 66 boys and 27 girls). Children with the combination of daytime incontinence (DI) and NE (DI+NE group: n = 45) and NE alone (isolated NE group: n = 48) were compared. UFM curve patterns were classified into five types: bell (B), tower (T), staccato (S), plateau (P), and interrupted (I). An unclassified (U) curve pattern was designated when all three curve patterns differed. Patterns other than the B pattern were considered abnormal (A). Each score in the dysfunctional voiding symptom score (DVSS) was also compared between the two groups. Results: The UFM curve pattern was B (n = 21), T (n = 15), S (n = 4), P (n = 1), U (n = 4) in the DI+NE group and B (n = 25), T (n = 10), S (n = 7), P (n = 2), U (n = 4) in the isolated NE group, indicating no significant difference (B vs A; P = .680). The two items of DVSS questionnaire were significantly greater in the DI+NE group than in the isolated NE group (voiding postponement: 0.93 ± 1.18 vs 0.23 ± 0.56, P = .001, urgency: 2.09 ± 1.06 vs 0.56 ± 0.85, P < .001). Conclusion: The abnormal UFM curve patterns did not differ significantly between NE children with and without DI. However, the DVSS questionnaire scores differed significantly. UFM did not reflect the urinary symptoms of children with NE.