Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound. (25th March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound. (25th March 2019)
- Main Title:
- Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound
- Authors:
- Niu, Lin
Bao, Lingyun
Zhu, Luoqian
Tan, Yanjuan
Xu, Xiaojing
Shan, Yanna
Liu, Jian
Zhu, Qingqing
Jiang, Chenxiang
Shen, Yingzhao - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic potential of an automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) system in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses compared with handheld ultrasound (HHUS). Methods: Women were randomly and proportionally selected from outpatients and underwent both HHUS and ABUS examinations. Masses with final American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 2 and 3 were considered benign. Masses with final Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 4 and 5 were considered malignant. The diagnosis was confirmed by pathologic results or at least a 1‐year follow‐up. Automated breast US and HHUS were compared on the basis of their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Diagnostic consistency and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed. The maximum diameters of masses were compared among HHUS, ABUS, and pathologic results. Results: A total of 599 masses in 398 women were confirmed by pathologic results or at least a 1‐year follow‐up; 103 of 599 masses were malignant, and 496 were benign. There were no significant differences between ABUS and HHUS in terms of diagnostic accuracy (80.1% versus 80.6%), specificity (77.62% versus 80.24%), positive predictive value (46.12% versus 46.46%), and negative predictive value (97.96% versus 95.67%). There were significant differences in sensitivity (92.23% versus 82.52%;Abstract : Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic potential of an automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) system in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses compared with handheld ultrasound (HHUS). Methods: Women were randomly and proportionally selected from outpatients and underwent both HHUS and ABUS examinations. Masses with final American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 2 and 3 were considered benign. Masses with final Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 4 and 5 were considered malignant. The diagnosis was confirmed by pathologic results or at least a 1‐year follow‐up. Automated breast US and HHUS were compared on the basis of their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Diagnostic consistency and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed. The maximum diameters of masses were compared among HHUS, ABUS, and pathologic results. Results: A total of 599 masses in 398 women were confirmed by pathologic results or at least a 1‐year follow‐up; 103 of 599 masses were malignant, and 496 were benign. There were no significant differences between ABUS and HHUS in terms of diagnostic accuracy (80.1% versus 80.6%), specificity (77.62% versus 80.24%), positive predictive value (46.12% versus 46.46%), and negative predictive value (97.96% versus 95.67%). There were significant differences in sensitivity (92.23% versus 82.52%; P < .01) and areas under the curve (0.85 versus 0.81; P < .05) between ABUS and HHUS. The correlation of the maximum diameter was slightly higher between ABUS and pathologic results ( r = 0.885) than between HHUS and pathologic results ( r = 0.855), but the difference was not significant ( P > .05). Conclusions: Automated breast US is better than HHUS in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses, especially with respect to specificity. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 38:Number 11(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of ultrasound in medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 38:Number 11(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 11 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0038-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 2871
- Page End:
- 2880
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03-25
- Subjects:
- automated breast ultrasound system -- breast cancer -- Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System -- handheld ultrasound
Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals
Ultrasonics
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonics in medicine
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.07543 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jultrasoundmed.org/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jum.14991 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0278-4297
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5071.455000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11889.xml