Validity of the Perception Neuron inertial motion capture system for upper body motion analysis. (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sers, Ryan; Forrester, Steph; Moss, Esther; Ward, Stephen; Ma, Jianjia; Zecca, Massimiliano
• Is Part Of: Measurement. Volume 149(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: Inertial motion capture -- IMUs -- Perception Neuron -- Vicon -- Upper body motion analysis -- Validation; Weights and measures -- Periodicals; Measurement -- Periodicals; Measurement; Weights and measures; Periodicals; 530.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107024
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0263-2241

Abstract

Highlights: The accuracy of the Perception Neuron inertial motion capture suit was evaluated. Vicon was used as the gold standard to assess joint angular outputs. A functional movement protocol was performed to represent practical usages. Bland-Altman and waveform agreement analysis was performed on system outputs. Perception Neuron is a valid method of assessing upper body motion to within 5°. Abstract: The commercially available Perception Neuron motion capture (Mo-Cap) system is a cost effective and easy to use option for motion analysis. However, the accuracy of this system in a practical setting is unknown and needs to be evaluated if it is to be considered for applications that require a specific level of measurement precision. Therefore, the validity of the Mo-Cap system for estimating postural angular kinematics of the upper body was assessed. Upper body motion was evaluated through three-dimensional analysis of functional movements performed by the neck, thorax and shoulders. Range of motion (RoM) estimates were compared to Vicon using Bland-Altman analysis. Systematic biases in neutral to peak RoM differences were all ≤4.5° and random biases ≤±4.5° except for neck extension where the values were larger. The present findings suggest that the Mo-Cap system is a valid method for assessing the majority of upper body ROM to within 5°.