"Like a mother-daughter relationship": Community health intermediaries' knowledge of and attitudes to abortion in Karnataka, India. (October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nandagiri, Rishita
• Is Part Of: Social science & medicine. Volume 239(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-10
• Subjects: India -- Abortion -- Abortion attitudes -- Abortion stigma -- Community health intermediaries -- Task-sharing -- Community health workers; Social medicine -- Periodicals; Medical anthropology -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine sociale -- Périodiques; Anthropologie médicale -- Périodiques; Santé publique -- Périodiques; Psychologie -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112525
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-9536

Abstract

Abstract: Community Health Intermediaries (CHIs)- ANMs, ASHAs, and pharmacists- are key to realising task-sharing efforts to increase abortion access in LMICs, but their knowledge of and attitudes to abortion remains underexplored. Evidence on abortion task-sharing has focused primarily on CHIs' technical and clinical abilities, overlooking social contexts and norms that influence attitudes and behaviours. This mixed-methods study describes the abortion knowledge, attitudes, and roles of three cadres of CHIs in rural districts of Karnataka, India. Quantitative data on CHIs' abortion attitudes (n = 118) were collected using the Stigmatising Attitudes, Behaviours, and Actions Scale (SABAS), followed by in-depth interviews (n = 21) with a subset of the population over eight months in 2017. Findings show that CHIs, present at multiple points in women's abortion trajectories, serve as barriers or facilitate access to abortion care. Their abortion attitudes reflect social contexts and environments, drawing on social norms surrounding fertility, woman- and mother-hood. They demonstrate poor knowledge of abortion laws, conflating them with sex-selection laws. CHIs also reflect poor knowledge of abortion methods. They report little to no training on abortion. CHIs contend with entrenched social and structural inequalities in carrying out their tasks, affecting the kind and quality of care they are able to provide. Understanding CHIs' experiences, knowledge and attitudes can advance abortion care-provision, support task-sharing efforts, and potentially improve the quality of women's abortion-seeking experiences. Highlights: Community health intermediaries play key roles in women's abortion trajectories. Poor abortion knowledge and stigmatising abortion attitudes can shape care practices. Stigmatising abortion attitudes are underpinned by fertility and sexuality norms. Task-sharing must account for influence of norms, hierarchies, and power relations. Abortion stigma conceptualisation should include affective and emotional responses.