Design of structural steel members by advanced inelastic analysis with strain limits. (15th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Design of structural steel members by advanced inelastic analysis with strain limits. (15th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- Design of structural steel members by advanced inelastic analysis with strain limits
- Authors:
- Fieber, Andreas
Gardner, Leroy
Macorini, Lorenzo - Abstract:
- Highlights: Design of steel members using advanced inelastic analysis with strain limits. Strain limits mimic local buckling and control spread of plasticity in beam FE. Capacity predictions were compared against 6188 benchmark shell finite element models. Proposed design method is consistently more accurate than current EN 1993-1-1 design. Abstract: Structural steel design is traditionally a two step process: first, the internal forces and moments in the structure are determined from a structural analysis. Then, a series of design checks are carried out to assess the strength and stability of individual members. The structural analysis is typically performed using beam finite elements, which are usually not able to capture local buckling explicitly. Instead, the assessment of local buckling and rotation capacity is made through the concept of cross-section classification, which places class-specific restrictions on the analysis type (i.e. plastic or elastic) and defines the cross-section resistance based on idealised stress distributions (e.g. the plastic, elastic or effective moment capacity in bending). This approach is however considered to be overly simplistic and creates artificial steps in the capacity predictions of structural members. A more consistent approach is proposed herein, whereby a second-order inelastic analysis of the structure or structural component is performed using beam finite elements, and strain limits are employed to mimic the effects of localHighlights: Design of steel members using advanced inelastic analysis with strain limits. Strain limits mimic local buckling and control spread of plasticity in beam FE. Capacity predictions were compared against 6188 benchmark shell finite element models. Proposed design method is consistently more accurate than current EN 1993-1-1 design. Abstract: Structural steel design is traditionally a two step process: first, the internal forces and moments in the structure are determined from a structural analysis. Then, a series of design checks are carried out to assess the strength and stability of individual members. The structural analysis is typically performed using beam finite elements, which are usually not able to capture local buckling explicitly. Instead, the assessment of local buckling and rotation capacity is made through the concept of cross-section classification, which places class-specific restrictions on the analysis type (i.e. plastic or elastic) and defines the cross-section resistance based on idealised stress distributions (e.g. the plastic, elastic or effective moment capacity in bending). This approach is however considered to be overly simplistic and creates artificial steps in the capacity predictions of structural members. A more consistent approach is proposed herein, whereby a second-order inelastic analysis of the structure or structural component is performed using beam finite elements, and strain limits are employed to mimic the effects of local buckling, control the spread of plasticity and ultimately define the structural resistance. The strain limits are obtained from the continuous strength method. It is shown that not only can local buckling be accurately represented in members experiencing uniform cross-sectional deformations along the length, but, by applying the strain limits to strains that are averaged over a defined characteristic length, the beneficial effects of local moment gradients can also be exploited. The proposed method is assessed against benchmark shell finite element results on isolated members subjected to bending, compression and combined loading. Compared to conventional steel design provisions and even to existing advanced design approaches utilising second-order elastic analysis, the proposed design approach provides consistently more accurate capacity predictions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Engineering structures. Volume 199(2019)
- Journal:
- Engineering structures
- Issue:
- Volume 199(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 199, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 199
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0199-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-15
- Subjects:
- Structural engineering -- Periodicals
Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals
Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques
Génie parasismique -- Périodiques
Pression du vent -- Périodiques
Earthquake engineering
Structural engineering
Wind-pressure
Periodicals
624.105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01410296 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109624 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0141-0296
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3770.032000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11897.xml