Loss-Framed Arguments Can Stifle Political Activism. Issue 3 (2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Levine, Adam Seth; Kline, Reuben
• Is Part Of: Journal of experimental political science. Volume 6:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 171
• Page End: 179
• Publication Date: 2019
• Subjects: Civic engagement, -- political participation, -- framing, -- loss aversion; Political science -- Periodicals; Political science -- Research -- Periodicals; Political science -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 320.0724
• DOI: 10.1017/XPS.2018.28
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2052-2630

Abstract

Abstract: Research commonly finds that citizens are loss averse: they dislike losses far more than similarly sized gains. One implication is that arguments for policy change framed in terms of losses to be avoided often have a larger impact on public opinion than arguments framed in terms of gains to be enjoyed. Although several scholars have observed this pattern with respect to public opinion, we know far less about the effect of loss- and gain-framed arguments on political activism. This is a critical omission given the disproportionate impact of political activists on the policymaking process. Using field and survey experiments, we investigate the impact of gain- and loss-framed arguments on climate change activism. We find that loss-framed arguments can be less mobilizing, even when they are otherwise more persuasive, than gain-framed arguments. Our results deepen our theoretical understanding of what motivates political activism, especially in an era of professionalized politics.