Adjusting for bias introduced by instrumental variable estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. (16th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martínez-Camblor, Pablo; Mackenzie, Todd; Staiger, Douglas O; Goodney, Philip P; O'Malley, A James
• Is Part Of: Biostatistics. Volume 20:Number 1(2019)
• Page Start: 80
• Page End: 96
• Publication Date: 2017-12-16
• Subjects: Individual frailty effect -- Instrumental variable -- Two-stage residual inclusion -- Unmeasured confounding; Medical statistics -- Periodicals; Biometry -- Periodicals; Health risk assessment -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Research -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; 610.727
• DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx062
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1465-4644

Abstract

Summary: Instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used for estimating average treatment effects in the presence of unmeasured confounders. However, the capability of existing IV procedures, and most notably the two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) algorithm recommended for use in non-linear contexts, to account for unmeasured confounders in the Cox proportional hazard model is unclear. We show that instrumenting an endogenous treatment induces an unmeasured covariate, referred to as an individual frailty in survival analysis parlance, which if not accounted for leads to bias. We propose a new procedure that augments 2SRI with an individual frailty and prove that it is consistent under certain conditions. The finite sample-size behavior is studied across a broad set of conditions via Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, the proposed methodology is used to estimate the average effect of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting on the mortality of patients suffering from carotid artery disease. Results suggest that the 2SRI-frailty estimator generally reduces the bias of both point and interval estimators compared to traditional 2SRI.