Effects of land‐cover changes on the partitioning of surface energy and water fluxes in Amazonia using high‐resolution satellite imagery. Issue 6 (2nd August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Oliveira, Gabriel; Brunsell, Nathaniel A.; Moraes, Elisabete C.; Shimabukuro, Yosio E.; dos Santos, Thiago V.; von Randow, Celso; de Aguiar, Renata G.; Aragao, Luiz E.O.C.
• Is Part Of: Ecohydrology. Volume 12:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2019-08-02
• Subjects: Amazonia -- ASTER images -- evapotranspiration -- land‐cover changes -- spatial variation; Ecohydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Water -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 577.6
• DOI: 10.1002/eco.2126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1936-0584

Abstract

Abstract: Spatial variability of surface energy and water fluxes at local scales is strongly controlled by soil and micrometeorological conditions. Thus, the accurate estimation of these fluxes from space at high spatial resolution has the potential to improve prediction of the impact of land‐use changes on the local environment. In this study, Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) and Large‐Scale Biosphere‐Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA) data were used to examine the partitioning of surface energy and water fluxes over different land‐cover types in one wet year (2004) and one drought year (2005) in eastern Rondonia state, Brazil. The spatial variation of albedo, net radiation ( Rn ), soil ( G ) and sensible ( H ) heat fluxes, evapotranspiration ( ET ), and evaporative fraction ( EF ) were primarily related to the lower presence of forest (primary [PF] or secondary [SF]) in the western side of the Ji‐Parana River in comparison with the eastern side, located within the Jaru Biological Reserve protected area. Water limitation in this part of Amazonia tends to affect anthropic (pasture [PA] and agriculture [AG]) ecosystems more than the natural land covers (PF and SF). We found statistically significant differences on the surface fluxes prior to and ~1 year after the deforestation. Rn over forested areas is ~10% greater in comparison with PA and AG. Deforestation and consequent transition to PA or AG increased the total energy (~200–400%) used to heat the soil subsurface and raise air temperatures. These differences in energy partitioning contributed to approximately three times higher ET over forested areas in comparison with nonforested areas. The conversion of PF to AG is likely to have a higher impact in the local climate in this part of Amazonia when compared with the change to PA and SF, respectively. These results illustrate the importance of conserving secondary forest areas in Amazonia.