Quality of coding within clinical datasets: A case-study using burn-related hospitalizations. Issue 7 (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Souza, Julio; Santos, João Vasco; Lopes, Fernando; Freitas, Alberto
• Is Part Of: Burns. Volume 45:Issue 7(2019)
• Page Start: 1571
• Page End: 1584
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: Burns -- Inpatient -- Diagnosis related group -- ICD-9-CM -- Clinical coding -- Administrative data -- Clinical data; Burns and scalds -- Periodicals; 617.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-4179

Abstract

Highlights: Abnormal frequencies in at least one APR-DRG were observed in all hospitals. Under-coding extensive third degree burns might have affected APR-DRGs assignment. Differences in coding common procedures might have influenced SOI frequencies. Hospitals differed significantly on coding burns in multiple sites. Hospitals differed significantly on reporting debridement procedures. Abstract: The quality of clinical data held in administrative databases is crucial for appropriate funding of health care services. As Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) continue to play an important role in hospital payment mechanisms, proper coding of diagnoses and procedures is of most concern. This study used an administrative, nationwide Portuguese inpatient database to characterize and assess coding patterns in burn-related hospitalization data, with a special focus on identifying suspected miscoding practices that could be affecting APR-DRG (All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups) classification. Using coded clinical data of 4, 182 burn-related admissions occurred between 2011 and 2015, we compared APR-DRG and Severity of Illness (SOI) frequencies between hospitals with a burn unit in Portugal. The frequencies of individual diagnosis and procedure codes among episodes grouped within the same APR-DRG were also compared. Hospitals with a burn unit in Portugal differed significantly in the frequencies of APR-DRGs 842 and 844. Proper coding of extensive third-degree burns might be related with the observed discrepant frequencies of APR-DRGs across the evaluated hospitals. Facilities also differed significantly concerning the proportions of SOI levels in certain APR-DRGs. Significant differences in reporting certain comorbidities and common hospital procedures, especially non-operating room procedures, might have influenced the observed discrepancies in SOI levels. Moreover, there seems to be a lack of standard in coding debridement procedures among the evaluated hospitals. Overall, we found some suspected coding patterns that could potentially be associated with miscoding practices impacting APR-DRG classification. Those findings could not only be relevant for planning future audit processes and improving medical coding practices, but also for discussing quality and desirable features of burn-related clinical data, keeping in mind their use for other purposes beyond DRG grouping, namely clinical and health care services research, as well as health care management.