Lower Eyelid Reconstruction: A New Classification Incorporating the Vertical Dimension. Issue 2 (August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lower Eyelid Reconstruction: A New Classification Incorporating the Vertical Dimension. Issue 2 (August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Lower Eyelid Reconstruction
- Authors:
- Alghoul, Mohammed S.
Bricker, Jonathan T.
Vaca, Elbert E.
Purnell, Chad A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Lower eyelid defects are traditionally classified based on depth and 25 percent increments in defect width. The authors propose a new classification system that includes the vertical defect component to predict functional and aesthetic outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent lower lid reconstruction performed by a single surgeon was performed. Defects were classified into four categories based on the vertical component: (1) pretarsal; (2) preseptal; (3) eyelid-cheek junction; and (4) complex pretarsal/preseptal. Preoperative and postoperative central and lateral marginal reflex distance-2 values were obtained. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by three blinded reviewers. Outcomes were compared using one-way analysis of variance and analysis of covariance with Bonferroni corrected post hoc comparisons to control for defect area and width. Results: Thirty-four patients underwent reconstruction of lower eyelid defects. There were 12 pretarsal defects (type I), nine preseptal defects (type II), nine eyelid-cheek defects (type III), and four complex pretarsal/preseptal defects (type IV). Postoperative retraction was highest in the complex pretarsal/preseptal group at 75 percent, with a significantly greater change from preoperative to postoperative central and lateral marginal reflex distance-2 compared with the other groups ( p < 0.01) and worse postoperative mean aesthetic scores ( p < 0.001). Type IV patients had significantlyAbstract : Background: Lower eyelid defects are traditionally classified based on depth and 25 percent increments in defect width. The authors propose a new classification system that includes the vertical defect component to predict functional and aesthetic outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent lower lid reconstruction performed by a single surgeon was performed. Defects were classified into four categories based on the vertical component: (1) pretarsal; (2) preseptal; (3) eyelid-cheek junction; and (4) complex pretarsal/preseptal. Preoperative and postoperative central and lateral marginal reflex distance-2 values were obtained. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by three blinded reviewers. Outcomes were compared using one-way analysis of variance and analysis of covariance with Bonferroni corrected post hoc comparisons to control for defect area and width. Results: Thirty-four patients underwent reconstruction of lower eyelid defects. There were 12 pretarsal defects (type I), nine preseptal defects (type II), nine eyelid-cheek defects (type III), and four complex pretarsal/preseptal defects (type IV). Postoperative retraction was highest in the complex pretarsal/preseptal group at 75 percent, with a significantly greater change from preoperative to postoperative central and lateral marginal reflex distance-2 compared with the other groups ( p < 0.01) and worse postoperative mean aesthetic scores ( p < 0.001). Type IV patients had significantly more revision operations (mean, 5.5) compared with the other groups ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: The vertical dimension of lower eyelid defects is an important variable. A new classification system is proposed that supplements width-based methods for improved surgical planning and prediction of postoperative outcomes in lower eyelid reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEEVL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 144:Issue 2(2019:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 144:Issue 2(2019:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 144, Issue 2 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 144
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0144-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005882 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0032-1052
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6528.924000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11840.xml