Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 32 (August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhu, Chao; Yin, Jian; Wang, Bin; Xue, Qingmei; Gao, Shan; Xing, Linyu; Wang, Hua; Liu, Wei; Liu, Xinhui
• Other Names: Augustin. Goran section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 98:Issue 32(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-08
• Subjects: blood transfusion -- hip fracture -- liberal transfusion -- restrictive transfusion; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016795
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) to investigate the effects of a restrictive strategy versus its liberal counterpart in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main clinical outcomes included delirium, mortality, infections, cardiogenic complications, thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular accidents, and length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis program of the Cochrane Collaboration (RevMan version 5.3.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by both Cochran chi-squared test (Q test) and I 2 test. Both Begg and Egger tests were used to assess potential publication bias. Results: We identified 7 eligible RCTs and 2 eligible RCSs, involving 3, 575 patients in total. In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, we found no differences in frequency of delirium, mortality, the incidence rates of all infections, pneumonia, wound infection, all cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, thromboembolic events or length of hospital stay between restrictive and liberal thresholds for RBC transfusion ( P >.05). However, we found that the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds is associated with higher rates of acute coronary syndrome ( P <.05) while liberal transfusion thresholds increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents ( P <.05). Conclusion: In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, clinicians should evaluate the patient's condition in detail and adopt different transfusion strategies according to the patient's specific situation rather than merely using a certain transfusion strategy.