OP36 A colonic gene expression signature predicts non-response to anti-inflammatory therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. (25th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sato, T; Li, K; Hayden, K; Tomsho, L; Baribaud, F; Brodmerkel, C; Greenbaum, L E; Friedman, J R; Curran, M; Imai, Y; Plevy, S; Telesco, S E
• Is Part Of: Journal of Crohn's and colitis. Volume 13(2019)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S025
• Page End: S025
• Publication Date: 2019-01-25
• Subjects: Inflammatory bowel diseases -- Periodicals; 616.344005
• DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy222.033
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1873-9946

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The ability to predict response to therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a significant unmet need. We previously described PROgECT, a Phase 2a open-label study of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), which prospectively validated the ability of a molecular profile score (MPS) consisting of a colonic 13-gene expression panel to predict response to TNF-antagonist therapy. Although the MPS had low specificity in predicting responders to therapy, we evaluated whether the MPS could be a useful tool in accurately identifying a subset of non-responder patients to therapy. Methods: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the MPS in identifying non-responders to therapy in four independent TNF-antagonist trials (ACT1, PURSUIT-SC, PROgECT, PURSUIT-J) and an anti-IL12/23 trial (UNITI). We also characterised the gene expression and microbiome profiles of predicted non-responders by the MPS using microarray and 16S sequencing in the PROgECT cohort. Results: We report that the MPS can accurately predict non-responders, as defined by lack of mucosal improvement, to TNF-antagonist therapy in UC in four independent clinical trials, with a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.78 in ACT1, 0.79 in PURSUIT-SC, 0.89 in PROgECT, and 0.73 in PURSUIT-J. In addition, the MPS could predict non-responders, as defined by lack of endoscopic response, to anti-IL12/23 therapy in Crohn's disease (CD) with an NPV of 0.85. The predicted non-responders by MPS did not differ compared with predicted responders in baseline disease severity as measured by Mayo Score, or baseline inflammatory markers including CRP, faecal calprotectin, or faecal lactoferrin levels. Transcriptomics and microbiome analysis revealed insights into potential ways to treat this predicted non-responder population, as predicted non-responders had 268 differentially expressed genes enriched in inflammatory pathways and also demonstrated significant microbial dysbiosis. Conclusions: The MPS consistently predicts non-responders to therapy in IBD regardless of ethnicity or whether the therapy targeted TNF or IL12/23 pathways. Clinical parameters and inflammatory markers by themselves lack the granularity to identify this subset of non-responder patients. The MPS is the first prospectively validated predictive biomarker that can accurately identify a discrete subset of non-responder patients to two different anti-inflammatory therapies and may be valuable in identifying subsets of patients in need of treatment with alternative therapies or for patient stratification in clinical trials.