Visual and Anatomic Outcomes in Perforating Ocular Injuries. (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kanu, Levi N.; Jiang, Yi; Gonzalez, Alvaro Fernandez-Vega; Mieler, William F.
• Is Part Of: Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. Volume 3:Number 6(2019)
• Page Start: 428
• Page End: 437
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: double-penetrating -- double-perforating -- foreign bodies -- foreign body -- open-globe injury -- perforating -- through and through; Retina -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Vitreous body -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Retina -- Diseases; Vitreous body -- Diseases; Periodicals; 617.735005
• DOI: 10.1177/2474126419865992
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2474-1264

Abstract

Purpose: This article reports the presentation, management, and outcomes in patients suffering perforating ocular injuries. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a single ophthalmology Level 1 trauma center. Patients with evidence of traumatic ocular perforation, with surgical intervention attended by a single vitreoretinal surgeon (W.F.M.), were reviewed between 2009 and 2017. Results: Six eyes from 6 patients with perforating ocular injuries were studied. All patients were male, between ages 11 and 56 years. Perforation was the result of gunshots (3), other accidental injury (2), or surgical complication (1). Varying degrees of retinal detachments were seen in all 6 patients. Pars plana vitrectomy, with endolaser around posterior entry or exit wounds, was performed on average 21.7 ± 8.9 days from the time of injury (range, 0-58 days). In all cases with intraorbital foreign bodies, the foreign bodies were left in place. The most recent postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to counting fingers. Missile injuries tended to have poorer vision. All cases achieved full anatomic attachment at most recent follow-up. There have been no orbital complications related to retained intraorbital foreign bodies, including endophthalmitis, orbital infections, or mechanical strabismus. Conclusion: This study demonstrates successful anatomic outcomes of 6 cases of perforating ocular injuries. Visual outcomes were variable, though missile injuries demonstrated worse prognosis, whereas several nonmissile macula-involving cases achieved quite favorable results. Although traumatic perforating injuries generally have guarded visual prognoses, favorable results may be achieved in select scenarios.