The retrospective study of 93 patients with transmigration of mandibular canine and a comparative analysis with a control group. (6th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Plakwicz, Paweł; Abramczyk, Joanna; Wojtaszek-Lis, Julita; Sajkowska, Jolanta; Warych, Barbara; Gawron, Katarzyna; Burzykowski, Tomasz; Zadurska, Małgorzata; Czochrowska, Ewa Monika; Wojtowicz, Andrzej; Górska, Renata; Kukuła, Krzysztof
• Is Part Of: European journal of orthodontics. Volume 41:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 390
• Page End: 396
• Publication Date: 2018-10-06
• Subjects: Orthodontics -- Periodicals; 617.643
• DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjy067
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0141-5387

Abstract

Summary: Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics of patients with unilateral transmigration of a mandibular canine in the largest study group presented until now. Materials and methods: The study group consisted of 93 patients with unilateral transmigration of mandibular canine; the control group included 85 non-affected patients. Type of transmigration, status of deciduous and permanent canines, prevalence of missing teeth, class of occlusion, and space conditions were assessed to draw comparisons between groups. Results: In this study, 64.5 per cent patients presented type 1 of transmigration; types 2, 3, 4, and 5 were present in, respectively, 23.7, 5.4, 4.3, and 2.1 per cent patients. There was a clear, statistically significant difference ( P < 0.0001) between the mean crown and apex migration and angulation for the three groups of canines (transmigrated, contralateral, and control), whereas no differences were observed for the total number of permanent teeth present. In the study group, 73.1 per cent patients retained their primary canine on the affected side and 18.3 per cent on the contralateral side; in the control group, 22.3 per cent subjects had at least one primary canine. There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of types of malocclusion between the study and the control groups. Conclusions: Transmigration of mandibular canine was associated with the presence of retained primary canine on the affected side, higher mesial tilting of contralateral mandibular canine when compared to the canines in the control group. Additionally, higher prevalence of Angle's Class I occlusion in patients with canine transmigration was recorded.