The effects of experimental design on mating preferences and reproductive isolation in killifish. (5th December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The effects of experimental design on mating preferences and reproductive isolation in killifish. (5th December 2018)
- Main Title:
- The effects of experimental design on mating preferences and reproductive isolation in killifish
- Authors:
- St. John, Michelle E
Fuller, Rebecca C - Abstract:
- Abstract : Bluefin killifish mate preference is best detected using mating behaviors, such as the number of courting bouts or the number of eggs produced with a mate. Using these measurements, we found that female bluefin killifish that co-occur with a close evolutionary relative have stronger mate preferences for their own species than their male counterparts, and even show increased mate preference for individuals from their own population. Abstract: Determining the direction and magnitude of mating preference is fundamental to many questions in evolutionary biology. Unlike the measurement of traits such as body size, the measurement of mating preferences is likely affected by experimental design. Scientists must choose both the behavioral assay in which to measure preference and the metrics that serve as a proxy for preference. The accuracy of these assays and metrics, however, is often unknown and seldom tested. Here, we compared the accuracy of 3 assays (dichotomous choice, audience assay, and no-choice assay) and 3 metrics (association time, courtship bouts, and number of eggs produced) in the bluefin killifish, which possesses strong, conspecific mating preferences when in sympatry with rainwater killifish. We consistently detected preferences in both males and females when using metrics associated with mating (i.e., courting bouts and number of eggs spawned). However, we failed to consistently detect preference when using time as a metric. We then used all 3 assaysAbstract : Bluefin killifish mate preference is best detected using mating behaviors, such as the number of courting bouts or the number of eggs produced with a mate. Using these measurements, we found that female bluefin killifish that co-occur with a close evolutionary relative have stronger mate preferences for their own species than their male counterparts, and even show increased mate preference for individuals from their own population. Abstract: Determining the direction and magnitude of mating preference is fundamental to many questions in evolutionary biology. Unlike the measurement of traits such as body size, the measurement of mating preferences is likely affected by experimental design. Scientists must choose both the behavioral assay in which to measure preference and the metrics that serve as a proxy for preference. The accuracy of these assays and metrics, however, is often unknown and seldom tested. Here, we compared the accuracy of 3 assays (dichotomous choice, audience assay, and no-choice assay) and 3 metrics (association time, courtship bouts, and number of eggs produced) in the bluefin killifish, which possesses strong, conspecific mating preferences when in sympatry with rainwater killifish. We consistently detected preferences in both males and females when using metrics associated with mating (i.e., courting bouts and number of eggs spawned). However, we failed to consistently detect preference when using time as a metric. We then used all 3 assays and metrics to test for cascade reinforcement. Cascade reinforcement predicts that enhanced behavioral isolation between sympatric species creates enhanced behavioral isolation among populations within species. We tested whether male and female bluefin killifish had heightened preference for mates from native over foreign populations. We consistently detected female preferences for native males, but did not detect male preferences for native females. Reproductive isolation values also reflect these preferences. Ultimately, we illustrated the importance of using multiple approaches to evaluate and legitimize measures of mating preference for males and females choosing among mates in different contexts. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Behavioral ecology. Volume 30:Number 1(2019)
- Journal:
- Behavioral ecology
- Issue:
- Volume 30:Number 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0030-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 92
- Page End:
- 100
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12-05
- Subjects:
- cascade reinforcement -- dichotomous choice -- female mate choice -- male mate choice -- no-choice assay -- reinforcement
Animal behavior -- Periodicals
Behavior evolution -- Periodicals
Ecology -- Periodicals
Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals
591.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://beheco.oupjournals.org ↗
http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/beheco/ary150 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1045-2249
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1877.390000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11804.xml