Indoor hospital air and the impact of ventilation on bioaerosols: a systematic review. Issue 2 (October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stockwell, R.E.; Ballard, E.L.; O'Rourke, P.; Knibbs, L.D.; Morawska, L.; Bell, S.C.
• Is Part Of: Journal of hospital infection. Volume 103:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 175
• Page End: 184
• Publication Date: 2019-10
• Subjects: Bioaerosols -- Indoor air -- Hospital -- Ventilation -- Healthcare-acquired infections; Cross infection -- Periodicals; Cross infection -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- prevention & control -- Periodicals; Infection Control -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 614.44
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.06.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-6701

Abstract

Summary: Healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs) continue to persist in hospitals, despite the use of increasingly strict infection-control precautions. Opportunistic airborne transmission of potentially pathogenic bioaerosols may be one possible reason for this persistence. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review the concentrations and compositions of indoor bioaerosols in different areas within hospitals and the effects of different ventilation systems. Electronic databases (Medline and Web of Science) were searched to identify articles of interest. The search was restricted to articles published from 2000 to 2017 in English. Aggregate data was used to examine the differences in mean colony forming units per cubic metre (cfu/m 3 ) between different hospital areas and ventilation types. A total of 36 journal articles met the eligibility criteria. The mean total bioaerosol concentrations in the different areas of the hospitals were highest in the inpatient facilities (77 cfu/m 3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 55–108) compared with the restricted (13cfu/m 3, 95% CI: 10–15) and public areas (14 cfu/m 3, 95% CI: 10–19). Hospital areas with natural ventilation had the highest total bioaerosol concentrations (201 cfu/m 3, 95% CI: 135–300) compared with areas using conventional mechanical ventilation systems (20 cfu/m 3, 95% CI: 16–24). Hospital areas using sophisticated mechanical ventilation systems (such as increased air changes per hour, directional flow and filtration systems) had the lowest total bioaerosol concentrations (9 cfu/m 3, 95% CI: 7–13). Operating sophisticated mechanical ventilation systems in hospitals contributes to improved indoor air quality within hospitals, which assists in reducing the risk of airborne transmission of HAIs.