Thermal acclimation is not induced by habitat-of-origin, maintenance temperature, or acute exposure to low or high temperatures in a pit-building wormlion (Vermileo sp.). (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bar-Ziv, Michael A.; Scharf, Inon
• Is Part Of: Journal of thermal biology. Volume 74(2018)
• Page Start: 181
• Page End: 186
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Antlion -- Chill-coma recovery time -- Trap-building predator -- Urban ecology -- Wormlion; Thermobiology -- Periodicals; Temperature -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; Thermobiologie -- Périodiques; Thermobiology; Periodicals; 571.46
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.03.024
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-4565

Abstract

Abstract: Wormlions are sit-and-wait insect predators that construct pit-traps to capture arthropod prey. They require loose soil and shelter from direct sun, both common in Mediterranean cities, and explaining their high abundance in urban habitats. We studied different aspects of thermal acclimation in wormlions. We compared chill-coma recovery time (CCRT) and heat-shock recovery time (HSRT) of wormlions from urban, semi-urban and natural habitats, expecting those originating from the urban habitat to be more heat tolerant and less cold tolerant. However, no differences were detected among the three habitats. We then examined whether maintenance temperature affects CCRT and HSRT, and expected beneficial acclimation. However, CCRT was unaffected by maintenance temperature, while temperature affected HSRT in an opposite direction to our prediction: wormlions maintained under the higher temperatures took longer to recover. When testing with two successive thermal shocks, wormlions took longer to recover from both cold and heat shock after applying an initial cold shock. We therefore conclude that cold shock inflicts some damage rather than induces acclimation. Finally, both cold- and heat-shocked wormlions constructed smaller pits than wormlions of a control group. Smaller pits probably translate to a lower likelihood of capturing prey and also limit the size of the prey, indicating a concrete cost of thermal shock. In summary, we found no evidence for thermal acclimation related either to the habitat-of-origin or to maintenance temperatures, but, rather, negative effects of unfavorable temperatures. Highlights: Wormlions did not differ in their thermal tolerance between urban and natural sites. Wormlions did not demonstrate thermal acclimation under laboratory conditions. Wormlions maintained at warmer temperatures recovered from heat shocks more slowly. Prior thermal shock had a negative effect on tolerance of the next applied shock. Thermal shocks probably impaired prey capture success.