Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial. Issue 11 (November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial. Issue 11 (November 2017)
- Main Title:
- Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): a randomised, multicentre trial
- Authors:
- Vaccaro, Olga
Masulli, Maria
Nicolucci, Antonio
Bonora, Enzo
Del Prato, Stefano
Maggioni, Aldo P
Rivellese, Angela A
Squatrito, Sebastiano
Giorda, Carlo B
Sesti, Giorgio
Mocarelli, Paolo
Lucisano, Giuseppe
Sacco, Michele
Signorini, Stefano
Cappellini, Fabrizio
Perriello, Gabriele
Babini, Anna Carla
Lapolla, Annunziata
Gregori, Giovanna
Giordano, Carla
Corsi, Laura
Buzzetti, Raffaella
Clemente, Gennaro
Di Cianni, Graziano
Iannarelli, Rossella
Cordera, Renzo
La Macchia, Olga
Zamboni, Chiara
Scaranna, Cristiana
Boemi, Massimo
Iovine, Ciro
Lauro, Davide
Leotta, Sergio
Dall'Aglio, Elisabetta
Cannarsa, Emanuela
Tonutti, Laura
Pugliese, Giuseppe
Bossi, Antonio C
Anichini, Roberto
Dotta, Francesco
Di Benedetto, Antonino
Citro, Giuseppe
Antenucci, Daniela
Ricci, Lucia
Giorgino, Francesco
Santini, Costanza
Gnasso, Agostino
De Cosmo, Salvatore
Zavaroni, Donatella
Vedovato, Monica
Consoli, Agostino
Calabrese, Maria
di Bartolo, Paolo
Fornengo, Paolo
Riccardi, Gabriele
… (more) - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: The best treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes in whom treatment with metformin alone fails to achieve adequate glycaemic control is debated. We aimed to compare the long-term effects of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas, given in addition to metformin, on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: TOSCA.IT was a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic clinical trial, in which patients aged 50–75 years with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (2–3 g per day) were recruited from 57 diabetes clinics in Italy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), by permuted blocks randomisation (block size 10), stratified by site and previous cardiovascular events, to add-on pioglitazone (15–45 mg) or a sulfonylurea (5–15 mg glibenclamide, 2–6 mg glimepiride, or 30–120 mg gliclazide, in accordance with local practice). The trial was unblinded, but event adjudicators were unaware of treatment assignment. The primary outcome, assessed with a Cox proportional-hazards model, was a composite of first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularisation, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned participants with baseline data available and without any protocol violations in relation to inclusion or exclusion criteria). This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT00700856 . Findings: Between Sept 18,Summary: Background: The best treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes in whom treatment with metformin alone fails to achieve adequate glycaemic control is debated. We aimed to compare the long-term effects of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas, given in addition to metformin, on cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: TOSCA.IT was a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic clinical trial, in which patients aged 50–75 years with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy (2–3 g per day) were recruited from 57 diabetes clinics in Italy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), by permuted blocks randomisation (block size 10), stratified by site and previous cardiovascular events, to add-on pioglitazone (15–45 mg) or a sulfonylurea (5–15 mg glibenclamide, 2–6 mg glimepiride, or 30–120 mg gliclazide, in accordance with local practice). The trial was unblinded, but event adjudicators were unaware of treatment assignment. The primary outcome, assessed with a Cox proportional-hazards model, was a composite of first occurrence of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularisation, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned participants with baseline data available and without any protocol violations in relation to inclusion or exclusion criteria). This study is registered withClinicalTrials.gov, numberNCT00700856 . Findings: Between Sept 18, 2008, and Jan 15, 2014, 3028 patients were randomly assigned and included in the analyses. 1535 were assigned to pioglitazone and 1493 to sulfonylureas (glibenclamide 24 [2%], glimepiride 723 [48%], gliclazide 745 [50%]). At baseline, 335 (11%) participants had a previous cardiovascular event. The study was stopped early on the basis of a futility analysis after a median follow-up of 57·3 months. The primary outcome occurred in 105 patients (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given pioglitazone and 108 (1·5 per 100 person-years) who were given sulfonylureas (hazard ratio 0·96, 95% CI 0·74–1·26, p=0·79). Fewer patients had hypoglycaemias in the pioglitazone group than in the sulfonylureas group (148 [10%] vs 508 [34%], p<0·0001). Moderate weight gain (less than 2 kg, on average) occurred in both groups. Rates of heart failure, bladder cancer, and fractures were not significantly different between treatment groups. Interpretation: In this long-term, pragmatic trial, incidence of cardiovascular events was similar with sulfonylureas (mostly glimepiride and gliclazide) and pioglitazone as add-on treatments to metformin. Both of these widely available and affordable treatments are suitable options with respect to efficacy and adverse events, although pioglitazone was associated with fewer hypoglycaemia events. Funding: Italian Medicines Agency, Diabete Ricerca, and Italian Diabetes Society. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet. Volume 5:Issue 11(2017)
- Journal:
- Lancet
- Issue:
- Volume 5:Issue 11(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 11 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0005-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 887
- Page End:
- 897
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11
- Subjects:
- Diabetes -- Periodicals
Endocrinology -- Periodicals
Endocrine glands -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.4 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30317-0 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2213-8587
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.080050
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11762.xml