Photons and foraging: Artificial light at night generates avoidance behaviour in male, but not female, New Zealand weta. (May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Farnworth, Bridgette; Innes, John; Kelly, Catherine; Littler, Ray; Waas, Joseph R.
• Is Part Of: Environmental pollution. Volume 236(2018)
• Page Start: 82
• Page End: 90
• Publication Date: 2018-05
• Subjects: Light pollution -- Cave and tree weta -- Avoidance behaviour -- Urban restoration -- Predation cues -- Sexual variation; Pollution -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Périodiques; Pollution -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Pollution -- Effets physiologiques -- Périodiques; Pollution; Pollution -- Environmental aspects; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.73
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.039
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-7491

Abstract

Abstract: Avoiding foraging under increased predation risk is a common anti-predator behaviour. Using artificial light to amplify predation risk at ecologically valuable sites has been proposed to deter introduced mice (Mus musculus) and ship rats (Rattus rattus) from degrading biodiversity in island ecosystems. However, light may adversely affect native species; in particular, little is known about invertebrate responses to altered lighting regimes. We investigated how endemic orthopterans responded to artificial light at Maungatautari Ecological Island (Waikato, New Zealand). We predicted that based on their nocturnal behaviour, ecology and evolutionary history, tree weta (Hemideina thoracica) and cave weta (Rhaphidophoridae) would reduce their activity under illumination. Experimental stations (n = 15) experienced three evenings under each treatment (order randomised): (a) light (illuminated LED fixture), (b) dark (unilluminated LED fixture) and (c) baseline (no lighting fixture). Weta visitation rates were analysed from images captured on infra-red trail cameras set up at each station. Light significantly reduced the number of observations of cave (71.7% reduction) and tree weta (87.5% reduction). In observations where sex was distinguishable (53% of all visits), male tree weta were observed significantly more often (85% of visits) than females (15% of visits) and while males avoided illuminated sites, no detectable difference was observed across treatments for females. Sex could not be distinguished for cave weta. Our findings have implications for the use of light as a novel pest management strategy, and for the conservation of invertebrate diversity and abundance within natural and urban ecosystems worldwide that may be affected by light pollution. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Artificial light generates avoidance behaviour in New Zealand weta. Male tree weta are deterred by illumination; females are not. Light pollution may impact apparent sex ratios of valuable indicator species. Abstract : Artificial light generates avoidance behaviour in New Zealand tree and cave weta; in tree weta (where sex was easily distinguishable), males were found to be deterred by illumination, while females were not.