How does information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening alter the intention to be screened?: a randomized survey of Norwegian women. Issue 2 (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Iyer, Anita L.; Bundorf, M. Kate; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte; Goldhaber-Fiebert, Jeremy D.; Cyr, Pascale-Renée; Sønbø Kristiansen, Ivar
• Is Part Of: European journal of cancer prevention. Volume 28:Issue 2(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: cervical cancer -- harm -- overdiagnosis -- overtreatment -- patient involvement -- screening -- shared decision-making; Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- etiology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- prevention & control -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Prevention; Periodicals; 616.994052
• DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000436
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-8278

Abstract

Abstract : Cervical cancer (CC) is the 13th most frequent cancer among women in Norway, but the third most common among women aged 25–49 years. The national screening program sends information letters to promote screening participation. We aimed to evaluate how women's stated intention to participate in screening and pursue treatment changed with the provision of additional information on harms associated with screening, and to assess women's preferences on the timing and source of such information. We administered a web-based questionnaire to a panel of Norwegian women aged 25–69 years and randomized into three groups on the basis of when in the screening process additional information was introduced: (i) invited for routine screening, (ii) recommended an additional test following detection of cellular abnormalities, and (iii) recommended precancer treatment. A fourth (control) group did not receive any additional information. Results show that among 1060 respondents, additional information did not significantly alter women's stated intentions to screen. However, it created decision uncertainty on when treatment was recommended (8.76–9.09 vs. 9.40; 10-point Likert scale; P =0.004). Over 80% of women favored receiving information on harms and 59% preferred that information come from a qualified public health authority. Nearly 90% of women in all groups overestimated women's lifetime risk of CC. In conclusion, additional information on harms did not alter Norwegian women's stated intention to screen for CC; yet, it resulted in greater decision uncertainty to undergo precancer treatment. Incorporating information on harms into invitation letters is warranted as it would increase women's ability to make informed choices. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.