The critical reception of the DSM-5: Towards a typology of audiences. (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Roy, Melissa; Rivest, Marie-Pier; Namian, Dahlia; Moreau, Nicolas
• Is Part Of: Public understanding of science. Volume 28:Number 8(2019)
• Page Start: 932
• Page End: 948
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: health communication -- media representation -- public understanding of science -- science attitudes and perceptions -- sociology of health and illness; Science news -- Periodicals; Science -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 303.483
• DOI: 10.1177/0963662519868969
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0963-6625

Abstract

Since its initial publication, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has been the object of criticism which has led to regular revisions by the American Psychiatric Association. This article analyses the debates that surrounded the publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Building on the concepts of public arenas and reception theory, it explores the meaning encoded in the manual by audiences. Our results, which draw from a thematic analysis of traditional and digital media sources, identify eight audiences that react to the American Psychiatric Association's narrative of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.): conformist, reformist, humanist, culturalist, naturalist, conflictual, constructivist and utilitarian. While some of their claims present argumentative polarities, others overlap, thus challenging the idea, often presented in academic publications, of a fixed debate. In order to further discuss on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, we draw attention to claims that 'travel' across different communities of audiences.