Vibration-based Bayesian model updating of civil engineering structures applying Gaussian process metamodel. Issue 16 (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moravej, Hossein; Chan, Tommy HT; Nguyen, Khac-Duy; Jesus, Andre
• Other Names: Zhou Lu guest-editor.; Ni Yi-Qing guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Advances in structural engineering. Volume 22:Issue 16(2019)
• Page Start: 3487
• Page End: 3502
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: Bayesian framework -- box Girder bridge -- finite element model updating -- Gaussian process -- structural health monitoring -- vibration analysis; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; Construction, Technique de la; Structural engineering; Periodicals; 624.1
• DOI: 10.1177/1369433219858723
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-4332

Abstract

Structural health monitoring plays a significant role in providing information regarding the performance of structures throughout their life spans. However, information that is directly extracted from monitored data is usually susceptible to uncertainties and not reliable enough to be used for structural investigations. Finite element model updating is an accredited framework that reliably identifies structural behavior. Recently, the modular Bayesian approach has emerged as a probabilistic technique in calibrating the finite element model of structures and comprehensively addressing uncertainties. However, few studies have investigated its performance on real structures. In this article, modular Bayesian approach is applied to calibrate the finite element model of a lab-scaled concrete box girder bridge. This study is the first to use the modular Bayesian approach to update the initial finite element model of a real structure for two states—undamaged and damaged conditions—in which the damaged state represents changes in structural parameters as a result of aging or overloading. The application of the modular Bayesian approach in the two states provides an opportunity to examine the performance of the approach with observed evidence. A discrepancy function is used to identify the deviation between the outputs of the experimental and numerical models. To alleviate computational burden, the numerical model and the model discrepancy function are replaced by Gaussian processes. Results indicate a significant reduction in the stiffness of concrete in the damaged state, which is identical to cracks observed on the body of the structure. The discrepancy function reaches satisfying ranges in both states, which implies that the properties of the structure are predicted accurately. Consequently, the proposed methodology contributes to a more reliable judgment about structural safety.