Primary repair of duodenal injuries: a retrospective cohort study from a major trauma centre in South Africa. (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Weale, R. D.; Kong, V. Y.; Bekker, W.; Bruce, J. L.; Oosthuizen, G. V.; Laing, G. L.; Clarke, D. L.
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of surgery. Volume 108:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 280
• Page End: 284
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: Damage control surgery -- duodenal injury -- laparotomy -- abdominal trauma -- duodenal leak -- duodenal AAST -- bowel injury; Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1177/1457496918822620
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1457-4969

Abstract

Background and Aims: The management of duodenal trauma remains controversial. This retrospective audit of a prospectively maintained database was intended to clarify the operative management of duodenal injury at our institution and to assess the risk factors for leak following primary duodenal repair. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study undertaken at the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Operative techniques used for duodenal repair were recorded. Our primary outcome was duodenal leak in the postoperative period. Patients from January 2012 to December 2016 were included. All duodenal injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading. Only patients who had a primary repair were included in the final analysis. Results: During the five-year data collection period, a total of 562 patients underwent a trauma laparotomy; of which 94 patients sustained a duodenal injury. A primary pyloric exclusion and gastro-jejunostomy (PEG) was performed in three patients. These three were then excluded from further analysis. Of the 91 primary duodenal repairs, seven (8%) subsequently leaked. These were managed by PEG in three and by secondary repair and para-duodenal drainage in four. The two physiological parameters most associated with subsequent leak were lactate and pH level. There was a significantly higher mortality rate for those who leaked vs those who did not leak. Chi-squared test revealed a significant difference in the leak rate between AAST I (0%), AAST-II (1.6%) and AAST-3 (66.7%) grade injuries (p <0.01). Conclusion: The trend towards primary repair of duodenal injuries appears to be justified. However duodenal leak remains a significant risk in certain high risk patients and strategies to manage injuries in this subset requires further work.