Biomechanical Comparison of the Influences of 2 Proximal Metatarsal Osteotomies on First Ray Articular Contact Characteristics. Issue 3 (12th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reddy, Sudheer C.; Li, Jihui; Cuttica, Daniel J.; Thiess, Mark
• Is Part Of: Foot & ankle orthopaedics. Volume 4:Issue 3(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09-12
• Subjects: forefoot disorders -- arthritis -- biomechanics -- osteotomy -- articular characteristics; Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Ankle -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; 617.584
• DOI: 10.1177/2473011419874051
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2473-0114

Abstract

Background: An understudied area of proximal first metatarsal osteotomies is the effect on articular contact properties following the surgeries. Potential long-term risks include altered joint mechanics and possible arthritic progression. A biomechanical comparison of articular characteristics of the proximal opening wedge and Ludloff osteotomies was performed in this study. It was hypothesized that the proximal opening wedge osteotomy (POWO) would lead to greater alterations in articular contact properties along the first ray. Methods: Seven paired fresh-frozen below-knee cadaveric limbs with hallux valgus were selected. Specimens in each pair were tested in the intact state and then randomized to receive either a Ludloff or POWO. A 4-mm opening wedge osteotomy was used in all cases. Loading of the flexor hallucis longus was to 100 N using an instrumented tensioner. A 28-N load was added at the distal phalanx to simulate the ground reaction force. First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and tarsometatarsal (TMT) articular properties were recorded simultaneously using 2 pressure sensors. For each state, a pressure map was generated and contact area, peak pressure, and center of pressure were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess statistical significance. Results: Average peak pressure was noted to be elevated at the MTP (4.6 vs 6.9 mPa, P = .04) and TMT (3.3 mPa vs 5.1 mPa, P = .30) joints when comparing the Ludloff and the POWO, respectively. Contact area was also noted to be lower in the POWO relative to the Ludloff for the MTP (86.6 vs 69.1 mm 2, P = .30) but not the TMT joints (89.1 vs 88.5 mm 2, P = .97). There was a slight plantar-lateral and dorsomedial shift in pressure at the MTP and TMT articulations, respectively, of the POWO relative to the Ludloff. A trend toward decreased contact force within the TMT joint was noted following opening wedge osteotomy relative to the intact state (103.8 vs 113.9 N, P = .31), while forces were elevated at the MTP joint (104.3 vs 96.0 N, P = .63), although not statistically significant. Smaller increases in TMT and MTP joint forces were noted following the Ludloff when compared to the intact state (95.6 vs 93.3 N at TMT and 109.2 vs 103.2 N at MTP). Conclusion: POWO can potentially change articular contact characteristics along the TMT and MTP articulations of the first ray. This could possibly lead to altered loading patterns and possible long-term damage vs other osteotomies. Clinical Relevance: While it is unlikely that the changes observed with the sizes of the osteotomy commonly used would lead to long-term significant clinical consequences, further study with larger group sizes would be beneficial.