Detection of bacteria in burn wounds with a novel handheld autofluorescence wound imaging device: a pilot study. (2nd August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Detection of bacteria in burn wounds with a novel handheld autofluorescence wound imaging device: a pilot study. (2nd August 2019)
- Main Title:
- Detection of bacteria in burn wounds with a novel handheld autofluorescence wound imaging device: a pilot study
- Authors:
- Pijpe, Anouk
Ozdemir, Yildiz
Sinnige, Jan C.
Kwa, Kelly A.A.
Middelkoop, Esther
Meij-de Vries, Annebeth - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To compare the detection of bacteria in burn wounds between an bacterial fluorescence imaging device MolecuLight i:X, (Canada), and standard microbiological swabs. Methods: Wounds were swabbed three times on one occasion; once with a standard swab, once with a high-fluorescent area swab, indicating a bacterial load >10 4 colony-forming units (CFU)/gram and a finally with a non-fluorescent (nF) area swab. Proportion agreement of the microbiological results was calculated and the accuracy of the device to detect relevant bacteria was assessed. Results: A total of 14 patients with 20 wounds participated in the study. Median post-burn day at sampling time was 21 days. Of the 20 wounds, nine had a positive swab result in either of the three swabs, and 11 showed a highfluorescent area. Overall, positive and negative proportion agreement between standard swab and high-fluorescent swab sample results were 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of presence of high-fluorescence were 78%, 64%, 64%, and 78%, respectively. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection, these results were 100%, 70%, 44% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the bacterial fluorescence imaging device to detect relevant bacteria in burn wounds was moderate and the reliability was equal to standard swabbing. Further research in larger sample sizes and on the relevance of minimal bacterial load and its potential to help with PseudomonasAbstract : Objective: To compare the detection of bacteria in burn wounds between an bacterial fluorescence imaging device MolecuLight i:X, (Canada), and standard microbiological swabs. Methods: Wounds were swabbed three times on one occasion; once with a standard swab, once with a high-fluorescent area swab, indicating a bacterial load >10 4 colony-forming units (CFU)/gram and a finally with a non-fluorescent (nF) area swab. Proportion agreement of the microbiological results was calculated and the accuracy of the device to detect relevant bacteria was assessed. Results: A total of 14 patients with 20 wounds participated in the study. Median post-burn day at sampling time was 21 days. Of the 20 wounds, nine had a positive swab result in either of the three swabs, and 11 showed a highfluorescent area. Overall, positive and negative proportion agreement between standard swab and high-fluorescent swab sample results were 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of presence of high-fluorescence were 78%, 64%, 64%, and 78%, respectively. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection, these results were 100%, 70%, 44% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the bacterial fluorescence imaging device to detect relevant bacteria in burn wounds was moderate and the reliability was equal to standard swabbing. Further research in larger sample sizes and on the relevance of minimal bacterial load and its potential to help with Pseudomonas aeruginosa management is needed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of wound care. Volume 28:Number 8(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of wound care
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Number 8(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 8 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0028-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 548
- Page End:
- 554
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08-02
- Subjects:
- auto-fluorescence -- bacteria -- burns -- colonisation -- swab -- wounds
Wounds and injuries -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Wound healing -- Periodicals
617.1 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/journal/jowc ↗
http://www.markallengroup.com/ma-healthcare/ ↗
http://www.internurse.com/cgi-bin/go.pl/library/issues.html?journal_uid=38 ↗
http://www.journalofwoundcare.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.8.548 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0969-0700
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11741.xml