A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Local Anesthetic Infiltration Via Abdominal Wound Catheter in Open Liver Resection. Issue 3 (March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Local Anesthetic Infiltration Via Abdominal Wound Catheter in Open Liver Resection. Issue 3 (March 2019)
- Main Title:
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Local Anesthetic Infiltration Via Abdominal Wound Catheter in Open Liver Resection
- Authors:
- Bell, Richard
Ward, Deesa
Jeffery, Julie
Toogood, Giles J.
Lodge, JPeter A.
Rao, Krishna
Lotia, Sharmeen
Hidalgo, Ernest - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aim: To compare outcomes following open liver resection (OLR) between patients receiving thoracic epidural (EP) versus abdominal wound catheters plus patient-controlled analgesia (AWC-PCA). Method: Patients were randomized 1:1 to either EP or AWC-PCA within an enhanced recovery protocol. Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS), other variables included functional recovery, pain scores, peak flow, vasopressor and fluid requirements, and postoperative complications. Results: Between April 2015 and November 2017, 83 patients were randomized to EP (n = 41) or AWC-PCA (n = 42). Baseline demographics were comparable. No difference was noted in LOS (EP 6 d (3–27) vs AWC-PCA 6 d (3–66), P = 0.886). Treatment failure was 20% in the EP group versus 7% in the AWC-PCA ( P = 0.09). Preoperative anesthetic time was shorter in the AWC-PCA group, 49 minutes versus 62 minutes ( P = 0.003). EP patients required more vasopressor support immediately postoperatively on day 0 (14% vs 54%, P = <0.001) and day 1 (5% vs 23%, P = 0.021). Pain scores were greater on day 0, afternoon of day 1 and morning of day 2 in the AWC-PCA group however were regarded as low at all time points. No other significant differences were noted in IV fluid requirements, nausea/sedation scores, days to open bowels, length of HDU, and postoperative complications. Conclusion: AWC-PCA was associated with reduced treatment failure and a reduced vasopressor requirement than EP up to 2 days postoperatively. WhileAbstract : Aim: To compare outcomes following open liver resection (OLR) between patients receiving thoracic epidural (EP) versus abdominal wound catheters plus patient-controlled analgesia (AWC-PCA). Method: Patients were randomized 1:1 to either EP or AWC-PCA within an enhanced recovery protocol. Primary outcome was length of stay (LOS), other variables included functional recovery, pain scores, peak flow, vasopressor and fluid requirements, and postoperative complications. Results: Between April 2015 and November 2017, 83 patients were randomized to EP (n = 41) or AWC-PCA (n = 42). Baseline demographics were comparable. No difference was noted in LOS (EP 6 d (3–27) vs AWC-PCA 6 d (3–66), P = 0.886). Treatment failure was 20% in the EP group versus 7% in the AWC-PCA ( P = 0.09). Preoperative anesthetic time was shorter in the AWC-PCA group, 49 minutes versus 62 minutes ( P = 0.003). EP patients required more vasopressor support immediately postoperatively on day 0 (14% vs 54%, P = <0.001) and day 1 (5% vs 23%, P = 0.021). Pain scores were greater on day 0, afternoon of day 1 and morning of day 2 in the AWC-PCA group however were regarded as low at all time points. No other significant differences were noted in IV fluid requirements, nausea/sedation scores, days to open bowels, length of HDU, and postoperative complications. Conclusion: AWC-PCA was associated with reduced treatment failure and a reduced vasopressor requirement than EP up to 2 days postoperatively. While the use of AWC-PCA did not translate into a shorter LOS in this study, it simplified patient management after OLR. EP cannot be routinely recommended following open liver resections. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 269:Issue 3(2019)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 269:Issue 3(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 269, Issue 3 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 269
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0269-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03
- Subjects:
- epidural -- ERAS -- liver resection -- wound catheter
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002988 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11727.xml