Relationship Between Ocular Surface Epithelial Damage, Tear Abnormalities, and Blink in Patients With Dry Eye. Issue 3 (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kato, Hiroaki; Yokoi, Norihiko; Watanabe, Akihide; Komuro, Aoi; Sonomura, Yukiko; Sotozono, Chie; Kinoshita, Shigeru
• Is Part Of: Cornea. Volume 38:Issue 3(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: dry eye -- ocular surface epithelial damage -- tear abnormalities -- blinks; Cornea -- Periodicals; Cornea -- Periodicals; Cornée -- Périodiques; 617.719
• DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001841
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-3740

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Considering that tears play the role of a lubricant, it is speculated that in the pathophysiology of dry eye, increased friction during blinking results in corneal and conjunctival damage, which may subsequently affect the blink. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between ocular surface epithelial damage, tear abnormalities, and blinks in patients with dry eye. Methods: This study involved 45 eyes of 45 female patients with dry eye (mean age: 57.6 years). In all eyes, tear meniscus radius (mm), spread grade of the tear film lipid layer (SG: 1-5: 1 being the best), fluorescein breakup time (FBUT, seconds), corneal and bulbar conjunctival epithelial damage (CED: 15 points maximum and CONJUNCTIVAL EPITHELIAL DAMAGE (CjED): 6 points maximum, respectively), and Schirmer I test (ST1, mm) were evaluated. Blink rate (BR, blinks per minute), palpebral aperture height (mm), upper-eyelid opening-phase amplitude/upper-eyelid closing-phase amplitude (mm), upper-eyelid opening-phase duration/upper-eyelid closing-phase duration (ms), and upper-eyelid opening-phase maximum velocity/upper-eyelid closing-phase maximum velocity (mm/s) were measured using a custom-made high-speed blink analyzer. Finally, the factors that determine CED and CjED were investigated by multiple regression analysis, in which the parameters were chosen using the stepwise procedure. Results: CED and CjED were found to be described as 2.687 + (1.816 × SG) − (0.937 × FBUT) (R 2 = 0.656, P < 0.0001) and 0.684 + (0.801 × SG) − (0.526 × FBUT) − (0.041 × ST1) + (0.010 × upper-eyelid closing-phase maximum velocity) (R 2 = 0.714, P < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: Although CED was significantly related to only tear abnormalities, CjED was significantly related to tear abnormalities and blinking.