Sensitivity analysis for matched pair analysis of binary data: From worst case to average case analysis. Issue 4 (27th March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hasegawa, Raiden; Small, Dylan
• Is Part Of: Biometrics. Volume 73:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 1424
• Page End: 1432
• Publication Date: 2017-03-27
• Subjects: Attributable effects -- Binary data -- Causal inference -- Cellphone -- Majorization -- Sensitivity analysis -- Traffic collision; Biometry -- Periodicals; 570.15195
• DOI: 10.1111/biom.12688
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-341X

Abstract

Summary: In matched observational studies where treatment assignment is not randomized, sensitivity analysis helps investigators determine how sensitive their estimated treatment effect is to some unmeasured confounder. The standard approach calibrates the sensitivity analysis according to the worst case bias in a pair. This approach will result in a conservative sensitivity analysis if the worst case bias does not hold in every pair. In this paper, we show that for binary data, the standard approach can be calibrated in terms of the average bias in a pair rather than worst case bias. When the worst case bias and average bias differ, the average bias interpretation results in a less conservative sensitivity analysis and more power. In many studies, the average case calibration may also carry a more natural interpretation than the worst case calibration and may also allow researchers to incorporate additional data to establish an empirical basis with which to calibrate a sensitivity analysis. We illustrate this with a study of the effects of cellphone use on the incidence of automobile accidents. Finally, we extend the average case calibration to the sensitivity analysis of confidence intervals for attributable effects.