Rate effect on crack propagation measurement results with crack propagation gauge, digital image correlation, and visual methods. (1st October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Rate effect on crack propagation measurement results with crack propagation gauge, digital image correlation, and visual methods. (1st October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Rate effect on crack propagation measurement results with crack propagation gauge, digital image correlation, and visual methods
- Authors:
- Ju, Minghe
Li, Jianchun
Yao, Qiangling
Li, Xiaofeng
Zhao, Jian - Abstract:
- Highlights: Rate-dependent quantitative gaps were revealed among the three measurement methods for rock crack propagation. Equivalent crack-velocity-dependent strain thresholds for the CPG, DIC and VISIBLE techniques are in linear fit. Reasons for the gaps between DIC and CPG were clarified from the viewpoint of fracture process zone. Three recommendations were proposed for the calibration of crack propagation measurement results. Abstract: The rate-dependent measurement gaps among the crack propagation gauge (CPG), digital image correlation (DIC), and Visual methods for measuring dynamic rock crack propagation were determined using a case study. Dynamic notched semi-circular bending (NSCB) tests of a rock material, namely, red sandstone, were conducted using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar system to form different crack propagating velocities (CPVs). From the viewpoint of the initial crack time, a normal strain threshold of 2% in the DIC was effective in obtaining a match between the CPG and DIC methods at a low CPV. However, the selected 2%–5% normal strains in the DIC were pivotal factors that could compromise the results from the CPG and Visual methods with a low CPV in terms of the peak CPV, whereas 2%–3% normal strains were recommended for cases with a high CPV. In addition, the equivalent crack-velocity-dependent strain thresholds ( t i DIC equal to t i CPG and t i DIC equal to t i Visual ) for the CPG, Visual, and DIC techniques displayed a linear fit withHighlights: Rate-dependent quantitative gaps were revealed among the three measurement methods for rock crack propagation. Equivalent crack-velocity-dependent strain thresholds for the CPG, DIC and VISIBLE techniques are in linear fit. Reasons for the gaps between DIC and CPG were clarified from the viewpoint of fracture process zone. Three recommendations were proposed for the calibration of crack propagation measurement results. Abstract: The rate-dependent measurement gaps among the crack propagation gauge (CPG), digital image correlation (DIC), and Visual methods for measuring dynamic rock crack propagation were determined using a case study. Dynamic notched semi-circular bending (NSCB) tests of a rock material, namely, red sandstone, were conducted using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar system to form different crack propagating velocities (CPVs). From the viewpoint of the initial crack time, a normal strain threshold of 2% in the DIC was effective in obtaining a match between the CPG and DIC methods at a low CPV. However, the selected 2%–5% normal strains in the DIC were pivotal factors that could compromise the results from the CPG and Visual methods with a low CPV in terms of the peak CPV, whereas 2%–3% normal strains were recommended for cases with a high CPV. In addition, the equivalent crack-velocity-dependent strain thresholds ( t i DIC equal to t i CPG and t i DIC equal to t i Visual ) for the CPG, Visual, and DIC techniques displayed a linear fit with the CPV. The measurement gap between the DIC and Visual methods was narrower than the measurement gap between the DIC and CPG methods. The critical initial crack time of CPG for red sandstone needed the condition of a CPV of approximately 500 m/s. A potential explanation for these gaps was proposed in terms of the changes in the fracture process zone with CPV, and three suggestions were subsequently recommended based on the experimental results to aid in the interpretation of other experimental results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Engineering fracture mechanics. Volume 219(2019)
- Journal:
- Engineering fracture mechanics
- Issue:
- Volume 219(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 219, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 219
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0219-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-01
- Subjects:
- Crack propagation gauge -- Digital image correlation -- Fracture process zone -- Rate dependent -- Rock material
Fracture mechanics -- Periodicals
Rupture, Mécanique de la -- Périodiques
Fracture mechanics
Periodicals
620.112605 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00137944 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/homepage.cws_home ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106537 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0013-7944
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3761.350000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11708.xml