Dislocation of a cerebral protection device component during carotid stenting: A case report of favorable outcome from conservative management after failure of retrieval. (2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tocco-Tussardi, Ilaria; Kulyk, Caterina; Vindigni, Vincenzo; Avruscio, Giampiero
• Is Part Of: International journal of surgery case reports. Volume 42(2018)
• Page Start: 254
• Page End: 257
• Publication Date: 2018
• Subjects: Angioplasty -- Carotid artery stenting -- Cerebral protection device -- Iatrogenic disease -- Mechanical complication -- Stroke; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; Surgery; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.12.032
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2210-2612

Abstract

Highlights: Though effective, CPDs may cause complications resulting in serious outcomes. No unique solution (conservative/surgical) for risk-free management of entrapment. Improving standard of care and patient safety is a top priority. Abstract: Introduction: Cerebral-protection devices (CPDs) are a well-established system for reduction of embolic risk in carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Although rare, adverse events with CPDs are unpredictable and can be associated with serious outcomes and iatrogenic sequelae. Presentation of case: We describe the unique case of dislocation of a FilterWire EX™ filter loop during right CAS. On trying to recapture the CPD filter at the end of the procedure, the filter loop suddenly detached from the guidewire and dislocated to the proximal middle cerebral artery. Attempted retrieval of the loop failed and the patient developed a transient neurological deficit caused by an acute ischemic infarction in the lenticular nucleus. No further retrieval attempt was pursued. No further dislocation of the loop or clinical event have been reported during the 16-year follow up. Discussion: This case reported a favorable outcome of conservative management for entrapped material from a CPD after iatrogenic damage from failed retrieval. No similar reports are available in the literature, and conservative management is generally not a recommended approach because of the potential complications. However, rescue retrieval attempts are as well a potential source of serious events, and no clear guidelines exist on the management of mechanical complications from CPD. Conclusion: Entrapment of CPD components constitutes an adverse event with no unique solution for risk-free management. The potential risks associated with the use of protection devices are still to be fully explored, and improving the standard of care and patient safety needs to be a top priority.