Yellow perch genetic structure and habitat use among connected habitats in eastern Lake Michigan. Issue 16 (23rd July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chorak, Gregory M.; Ruetz, Carl R.; Thum, Ryan A.; Partridge, Charlyn G.; Janetski, David J.; Höök, Tomas O.; Clapp, David F.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 9:Issue 16(2019)
• Page Start: 8922
• Page End: 8932
• Publication Date: 2019-07-23
• Subjects: drowned river mouth lakes -- microsatellites -- Perca flavescens -- population; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5219
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: Maintenance of genetic and phenotypic diversity is widely recognized as an important conservation priority, yet managers often lack basic information about spatial patterns of population structure and its relationship with habitat heterogeneity and species movement within it. To address this knowledge gap, we focused on the economically and ecologically prominent yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ). In the Lake Michigan basin, yellow perch reside in nearshore Lake Michigan, including drowned river mouths (DRMs)—protected, lake‐like habitats that link tributaries to Lake Michigan. The goal of this study was to examine the extent that population structure is associated with Great Lakes connected habitats (i.e., DRMs) in a mobile fish species using yellow perch as a model. Specifically, we tested whether DRMs and eastern Lake Michigan constitute distinct genetic stocks of yellow perch, and if so, whether those stocks migrate between the two connected habitats throughout the year. To do so, we genotyped yellow perch at 14 microsatellite loci collected from 10 DRMs in both deep and littoral habitats during spring, summer, and autumn and two nearshore sites in Lake Michigan (spring and autumn) during 2015–2016 and supplemented our sampling with fish collected in 2013. We found that yellow perch from littoral‐DRM habitats were genetically distinct from fish captured in nearshore Lake Michigan. Our data also suggested that Lake Michigan yellow perch likely use deep‐DRM habitats during autumn. Further, we found genetic structuring among DRMs. These patterns support hypotheses of fishery managers that yellow perch seasonally migrate to and from Lake Michigan, yet, interestingly, these fish do not appear to interbreed with littoral fish despite occupying the same DRM. We recommend that fisheries managers account for this complex population structure and movement when setting fishing regulations and assessing the effects of harvest in Lake Michigan. Abstract : Yellow perch are an exploited species in the Great Lakes and understanding their habitat movement and genetic structuring is important for managers. Here, we showed that yellow perch populations are distinct between habitats but that populations use different habitats through‐out the year, which is important information to sustainably manage yellow perch in those habitats.