Is Partnership Intensity or Density More Effective?. Issue 5 (3rd September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fowler, Luke
• Is Part Of: Public performance & management review. Volume 42:Issue 5(2019)
• Page Start: 1186
• Page End: 1210
• Publication Date: 2019-09-03
• Subjects: Cross-sectoral collaboration -- intergovernmental relations -- partnerships; Civil service -- Labor productivity -- Periodicals; Civil service -- Labor productivity -- United States -- Periodicals; Government productivity -- Periodicals; Government productivity -- United States -- Periodicals; Public administration -- Periodicals; Public administration -- United States -- Periodicals; Civil service -- Labor productivity; Government productivity; Public administration; United States; Periodicals; 351.05
• DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2018.1562946
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1530-9576

Abstract

Abstract: Current scholarship identifies benefits to both quality of partnerships and extensiveness of networks when managing shared policy goals. However, with limited collaborative capacity, many public service organizations are faced with a decision of whether to pursue intense connections with specific organizations or dense ties with an array of organizations. From using survey data from 72 local air agencies, findings indicate that intense partnerships are better predictors of improved air quality than dense ties. Conclusions suggest that building strong partnerships is more important than building many partnerships when pursuing shared policy goals in a multidimensional environment.