Institutional investors' investment preference and monitoring: evidence from Malaysia. Issue 9 (9th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tee, Chwee Ming
• Is Part Of: Managerial finance. Volume 45:Issue 9(2019)
• Page Start: 1327
• Page End: 1346
• Publication Date: 2019-09-09
• Subjects: Firm performance -- Firm valuation -- Business relationship -- Capital expenditure -- Institutional domiciles -- Institutional investors; Corporations -- Finance -- Periodicals; Business enterprises -- Finance -- Periodicals; 658.1505
• DOI: 10.1108/MF-07-2018-0314
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0307-4358

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the investment preference of various types of institutional investors in Malaysia, and its influence on firm valuation, operating performance and capital expenditure. Design/methodology/approach: This study employs ordinary least squares model to examine: investment preference according to different types of institutional investors; the association between various types of institutional investors and firm valuation; the association between various types of institutional investors and firm performance; and the association between various types of institutional investors and capital expenditure. Findings: The result shows that different types of institutional investors exhibit different investment preference. From the domiciles perspective, local institutional investors (LII) are found to be associated with higher Tobin's Q, ROA and net profit margin. When viewed from business relationship perspective, "pressure-resistant" institutional investors (PRII) are positively associated with Tobin's Q, ROA and net profit margin. Both LII and PRII are also associated with higher capital expenditure. Originality/value: This study reveals the investment preferences of various types of institutional investors in an emerging market economy. The results show that institutional monitoring is associated with higher firm valuation, higher firm performance and higher capital expenditure. However, the effect is largely driven by local and PRII, particularly government-controlled institutional funds. These evidence suggest that different firm outcomes between emerging and advanced economy can be explained by variation in institutional setting.