Association of an organ transplant-based approach with a dramatic reduction in postoperative complications following radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy in renal cell carcinoma. Issue 10 (October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Association of an organ transplant-based approach with a dramatic reduction in postoperative complications following radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy in renal cell carcinoma. Issue 10 (October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Association of an organ transplant-based approach with a dramatic reduction in postoperative complications following radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy in renal cell carcinoma
- Authors:
- González, Javier
Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
Martínez-Salamanca, Juan I.
Capitanio, Umberto
Tilki, Derya
Carballido, Joaquín A.
Chantada, Venancio
Daneshmand, Siamak
Evans, Christopher P.
Gasch, Claudia
Gontero, Paolo
Haferkamp, Axel
Huang, William C.
Espinós, Estefania Linares
Master, Viraj A.
McKiernan, James M.
Montorsi, Francesco
Pahernik, Sascha
Palou, Juan
Pruthi, Raj S.
Rodriguez-Faba, Oscar
Russo, Paul
Scherr, Douglas S.
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Spahn, Martin
Terrone, Carlo
Vera-Donoso, Cesar
Zigeuner, Richard
Hohenfellner, Markus
Libertino, John A.
Ciancio, Gaetano
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Our aim was to determine whether using an organ transplant-based(TB) approach reduces postoperative complications(PCs) following radical nephrectomy(RN) and tumor thrombectomy(TT) in renal cell carcinoma(RCC) patients with level II-IV thrombi. Methods: A total of 390(292 non-TB/98 TB) IRCC-VT Consortium patients who received no preoperative embolization/IVC filter were included. Stepwise linear/logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant multivariable predictors of intraoperative estimated blood loss(IEBL), number blood transfusions received, and overall/major PC development within 30days following surgery. Propensity to receive the TB approach was controlled. Results: The TB approach was clearly superior in limiting IEBL, blood transfusions, and PC development, even after controlling for other significant prognosticators/propensity score(P < .000001 in each case). Median IEBL for non-TB/TB approaches was 1000 cc/300 cc and 1500 cc/500 cc for tumor thrombus Level II-III patients, respectively, with no notable differences for Level IV patients(2000 cc each). In comparing PC outcomes between non-TB/TB patients with a non-Right-Atrium Cranial Limit, the observed percentage developing a: i) PC was 65.8%(133/202) vs. 4.3%(3/69) for ECOG Performance Status(ECOG-PS) 0–1, and 84.8%(28/33) vs. 25.0%(4/16) for ECOG-PS 2–4, and ii) major PC was 16.8%(34/202) vs. 1.4%(1/69) for ECOG-PS 0–1, and 27.3%(9/33) vs. 12.5%(2/16) for ECOG-PS 2–4.Abstract: Objectives: Our aim was to determine whether using an organ transplant-based(TB) approach reduces postoperative complications(PCs) following radical nephrectomy(RN) and tumor thrombectomy(TT) in renal cell carcinoma(RCC) patients with level II-IV thrombi. Methods: A total of 390(292 non-TB/98 TB) IRCC-VT Consortium patients who received no preoperative embolization/IVC filter were included. Stepwise linear/logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant multivariable predictors of intraoperative estimated blood loss(IEBL), number blood transfusions received, and overall/major PC development within 30days following surgery. Propensity to receive the TB approach was controlled. Results: The TB approach was clearly superior in limiting IEBL, blood transfusions, and PC development, even after controlling for other significant prognosticators/propensity score(P < .000001 in each case). Median IEBL for non-TB/TB approaches was 1000 cc/300 cc and 1500 cc/500 cc for tumor thrombus Level II-III patients, respectively, with no notable differences for Level IV patients(2000 cc each). In comparing PC outcomes between non-TB/TB patients with a non-Right-Atrium Cranial Limit, the observed percentage developing a: i) PC was 65.8%(133/202) vs. 4.3%(3/69) for ECOG Performance Status(ECOG-PS) 0–1, and 84.8%(28/33) vs. 25.0%(4/16) for ECOG-PS 2–4, and ii) major PC was 16.8%(34/202) vs. 1.4%(1/69) for ECOG-PS 0–1, and 27.3%(9/33) vs. 12.5%(2/16) for ECOG-PS 2–4. Major study limitation was the fact that all TB patients were treated by a single, experienced, high volume surgeon from one center (non-TB patients were treated by various surgeons at 13 other centers). Conclusions: Despite this major study limitation, the observed dramatic differences in PC outcomes suggest that the TB approach offers a major breakthrough in limiting operative morbidity in RCC patients receiving RN and TT. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 45:Issue 10(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 45:Issue 10(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 45, Issue 10 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0045-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1983
- Page End:
- 1992
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10
- Subjects:
- Renal cell carcinoma -- Inferior vena cava -- Tumor thrombus -- Surgical technique -- Postoperative complications
Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.009 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 11661.xml